Cited by 268Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesGenetic diversity and population structurePlant Diversity and Evolution

Detection and Polarization of Introgression in a Five-Taxon Phylogeny

Open access
Pease, James B., Hahn, Matthew W.·2015·Systematic Biology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

When multiple speciation events occur rapidly in succession, discordant genealogies due to incomplete lineage sorting (ILS) can complicate the detection of introgression. A variety of methods, including the [Formula: see text]-statistic (a.k.a. the "ABBA-BABA test"), have been proposed to infer introgression in the presence of ILS for a four-taxon clade. However, no integrated method exists to detect introgression using allelic patterns for more complex phylogenies. Here we explore the issues associated with previous systems of applying [Formula: see text]-statistics to a larger tree topology, and propose new [Formula: see text] tests as an integrated framework to infer both the taxa involved in and the direction of introgression for a symmetric five-taxon phylogeny. Using theory and simulations, we show that the [Formula: see text] statistics correctly identify the introgression donor and recipient lineages, even at low rates of introgression. [Formula: see text] is also shown to have extremely low false-positive rates. The [Formula: see text] tests are computationally inexpensive to calculate and can easily be applied to phylogenomic data sets, both genome-wide and in windows of the genome. In addition, we explore both the principles and problems of introgression detection in even more complex phylogenies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/sysbio/syv023

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Eriksson A., Manica A. 2012. Effect of ancient population structure on the degree of polymorphism shared between modern human populations and ancient hominins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 109:13956-13960.
  2. Huson D.H., Klöpper T., Lockhart P.J., Steel M.A. 2005. Reconstruction of reticulate networks from gene trees. In: Miyano S., Mesirov J., Kasif S., Istrail S., Pevzner P.A., Waterman M., editors. Research in computational molecular biology. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer. p. 233-249.
  3. Jónsson H., Schubert M., Seguin-Orlando A., Ginolhac A., Petersen L., Fumagalli M., Albrechtsen A., Petersen B., Korneliussen T.S., Vilstrup J.T., Lear T., Myka J.L., Lundquist J., Miller D.C., Alfarhan A.H., Alquraishi S.A., Al-Rasheid K.A.S., Stagegaard J., Strauss G., Bertelsen M.F., Sicheritz-Ponten T., Antczak D.F., Bailey E., Nielsen R., Willerslev E., Orlando L. 2014. Speciation with gene flow in equids despite extensive chromosomal plasticity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 111:18655-18660.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pease, J. B., & Hahn, M. W.
Affiliations
Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Corresponding author
Pease, James B.
Venue
Systematic Biology
Published
2015-04-17
Volume
64
Issue
4
Pages
651-662
ISSN
  • 1063-5157 (ISSN-L)
  • 1076-836X
OpenAlex
W2110687077
Cited by
268
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
7.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Systematic Biology (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (1127059)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant Diversity and Evolution
Keywords
introgression detection, incomplete lineage sorting, phylogenomics, hybridization, false positive rate
MeSH terms
Animals, Classification, Computer Simulation, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Humans, Phylogeny, Neanderthals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review