Using implementation strategies in community settings: an introduction to the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) compilation and future directions
Abstract
In this commentary, we introduce public health practitioners and researchers to implementation science through an established compilation of implementation strategies. We provide terminology and examples for community settings so public health practitioners and researchers can use implementation strategies and document efforts using standard terminology. We also discuss the need for future work to determine the extent to which these implementation strategies work and are most useful in community settings, and ultimately, how health behaviors are impacted. We intend this commentary to serve as a dissemination strategy for implementation strategies and to contribute to knowledge in the growing field of implementation science in community settings.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The ERIC taxonomy has been widely adopted and further refined.
“The ERIC taxonomy has been widely adopted and further refined [6–13].”
From A systematic review of experimentally tested implementation strategies across health and human service settings: evidence from 2010-2022 (2024) · cites this paper as [12]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 92 · Cited by 63
- Authors
- Balis, L. E., Houghtaling, B., & Harden, S. M.
- Affiliations
- Pacific Institute For Research and Evaluation (US)
- Louisiana State University (US)
- Virginia Tech (US)
- Corresponding author
- Balis, Laura E
- Venue
- Translational Behavioral Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2022-08-30
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 965-978
- ISSN
- 1613-9860 (ISSN-L)
- 1869-6716
- OpenAlex
- W4293576554
- Cited by
- 63
- References
- 92
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 14.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Translational Behavioral Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- United States Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture (1024670)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Community Health and Development
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Public Health Policies and Education
- Keywords
- implementation strategies, implementation science, community settings, Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change, public health practice, health behavior change
- MeSH terms
- Implementation Science, Humans, Public Health, Health Behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review