The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The enigma of arsenic carcinogenesis: role of metabolism
Abstract
Inorganic arsenic is considered a high-priority hazard, particularly because of its potential to be a human carcinogen. In exposed human populations, arsenic is associated with tumors of the lung, skin, bladder, and liver. While it is known to be a human carcinogen, carcinogenesis in laboratory animals by this metalloid has never been convincingly demonstrated. Therefore, no animal models exist for studying molecular mechanisms of arsenic carcinogenesis. The apparent human sensitivity, combined with our incomplete understanding about mechanisms of carcinogenic action, create important public health concerns and challenges in risk assessment, which could be met by understanding the role of metabolism in arsenic toxicity and carcinogenesis. This symposium summary covers three critical major areas involving arsenic metabolism: its biodiversity, the role of arsenic metabolism in molecular mechanisms of carcinogenesis, and the impact of arsenic metabolism on human risk assessment. In mammals, arsenic is metabolized to mono- and dimethylated species by methyltransferase enzymes in reactions that require S-adenosyl-methionine (SAM) as the methyl donating cofactor. A remarkable species diversity in arsenic methyltransferase activity may account for the wide variability in sensitivity of humans and animals to arsenic toxicity. Arsenic interferes with DNA methyltransferases, resulting in inactivation of tumor suppressor genes through DNA hypermethylation. Other studies suggest that arsenic-induced malignant transformation is linked to DNA hypomethylation subsequent to depletion of SAM, which results in aberrant gene activation, including oncogenes. Urinary profiles of arsenic metabolites may be a valuable tool for assessing human susceptibility to arsenic carcinogenesis. While controversial, the idea that unique arsenic metabolic properties may explain the apparent non-linear threshold response for arsenic carcinogenesis in humans. In order to address these outstanding issues, further efforts are required to identify an appropriate animal model to elucidate carcinogenic mechanisms of action, and to define dose-response relationships.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Zhao, C. Q., Young, M. R., Diwan, B. A., Coogan, T. P., & Waalkes, M. P. (1997) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.94.20.10907 · Cited by 559
Self-citation
Cited by
Mandal, B. K., Ogra, Y., & Suzuki, K. T. (2001) · Chemical Research in Toxicology · doi:10.1021/tx000246h · Cited by 349
Wei, M., Wanibuchi, H., Morimura, K., Iwai, S., Yoshida, K., Endo, G., Nakae, D., & Fukushima, S. (2002) · Carcinogenesis · doi:10.1093/carcin/23.8.1387 · Cited by 222
Arsenite Causes DNA Damage in Keratinocytes Via Generation of Hydroxyl Radicals
Shi, H., Hudson, L. G., Ding, W., Wang, S., Cooper, K. L., Liu, S., Chen, Y., Shi, X., & Liu, K. J. (2004) · Chemical Research in Toxicology · doi:10.1021/tx049939e · Cited by 159
Metadata
- Authors
- Goering, P.
- Venue
- Toxicological Sciences
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1999-05-01
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5-14
- ISSN
- 1096-0929 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2168284337
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The enigma of arsenic carcinogenesis: role of metabolism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/toxsci/49.1.5
- The paper
- Goering, P. (1999). The enigma of arsenic carcinogenesis: role of metabolism. Toxicological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/49.1.5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.