Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 4

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Chronic Inhalation of Short Asbestos Fibers

PLATEK, S. FRANK, GROTH, DAVID H., ULRICH, CHARLES E., STETTLER, LLOYD E., FTNNELL, MYRA S., STOLL, MARGRIT·1985·Toxicological Sciences
DOI 10.1093/toxsci/5.2.327
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

An animal inhalation study was initiated to study the chronic biological effects of inhalation of short chrysotile asbestos fibers. Rats and monkeys were exposed for 18 months, 7 hr/day, 5 days/week to a specially prepared, chrysotile asbestos aerosol. Based upon daily chamber measurements, the mean concentration of fibers in the chamber air was 1.0 mg/m3. By phase contrast microscopy, the number of fibers greater than 5 micron in length was determined to be 0.79 fiber per cubic centimeter. Rats were autopsied for pathological and histochemical examination at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after initiating exposures. No significant differences in the histochemical data were seen between the exposed and control groups. Gross and histopathologic examination of exposed and control groups of rats indicated no compound-related lesions, including fibrosis. Open lung biopsies were performed on the chrysotile-exposed and the control monkeys 28 months after initiating exposures. Histopathologic evaluation of the lung biopsy tissue showed the presence of asbestos bodies adjacent to the terminal bronchioles of the asbestos-exposed monkeys. There was no observed fibrosis in pulmonary tissue. All monkeys are being maintained for an indefinite period and observed for signs of latent pulmonary disease.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/toxsci/5.2.327

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 4

Metadata

Authors
PLATEK, S. F., GROTH, D. H., ULRICH, C. E., STETTLER, L. E., FTNNELL, M. S., & STOLL, M.
Venue
Toxicological Sciences
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
1985
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
327-340
ISSN
  • 1096-6080
  • 1096-0929
DOI
10.1093/toxsci/5.2.327
Cited by
1
References
20
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.