The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mode of Cell Death after Acetaminophen Overdose in Mice: Apoptosis or Oncotic Necrosis?
Abstract
Acetaminophen (AAP) overdose can cause severe liver injury and liver failure in experimental animals and humans. Recently, several authors proposed that apoptosis might be a major mechanism of cell death after AAP treatment. To address this controversial issue, we evaluated a detailed time course of liver injury after AAP (300 mg/kg) in fasted C3Heb/FeJ mice. Apoptotic hepatocytes were quantified in H&E-stained liver sections using morphologic criteria (cell shrinkage, chromatin condensation and margination, and apoptotic bodies). The number of apoptotic hepatocytes remained at baseline (0.2 +/- 0.1 cells/10 high-power fields [HPF]) up to 2 h after AAP administration. However, between 3 and 24 h, apoptotic cell death increased significantly, e.g., 6.3 +/- 0.8 cells/10 HPF at 6 h. Despite the increase in the number of hepatocytes meeting the morphological criteria of apoptosis, this cell fraction remained well below 1% of all parenchymal cells. No evidence for caspase-3 processing or increase in enzyme activity was detected at any time. These results were compared to the overall percent of necrotic cells in liver sections. Confluent areas of centrilobular necrosis were estimated to involve 40-60% of all hepatocytes between 3 and 24 h after AAP administration. These numbers correlated with the increase in plasma alanine aminotransferase activities, which reached a peak level of 5900 +/- 1350 U/l at 24 h. A similar result was obtained with higher doses of AAP and with the use of fed animals. Thus, oncotic necrosis and not apoptosis is the principal mechanism of liver-cell death after AAP overdose in vivo.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Knight, T. R. (2001) · Toxicological Sciences · doi:10.1093/toxsci/62.2.212 · Cited by 313
Ca 2+ antagonists inhibit DNA fragmentation and toxic cell death induced by acetaminophen 1
Ray, S. D., Kamendulis, L. M., Gurule, M. W., Yorkin, R. D., & Corcoran, G. B. (1993) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fasebj.7.5.8462787 · Cited by 198
Cited by
Apoptosis and necroptosis in the liver: a matter of life and death
Schwabe, R. F., & Luedde, T. (2018) · Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1038/s41575-018-0065-y · Cited by 582
Hanawa, N., Shinohara, M., Saberi, B., Gaarde, W. A., Han, D., & Kaplowitz, N. (2008) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m708916200 · Cited by 527
C-Jun N-terminal kinase plays a major role in murine acetaminophen hepatotoxicity
Gunawan, B. K., Liu, Z., Han, D., Hanawa, N., Gaarde, W. A., & Kaplowitz, N. (2006) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2006.03.045 · Cited by 471
Saito, C., Zwingmann, C., & Jaeschke, H. (2010) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.23267 · Cited by 430
Cover, C., Mansouri, A., Knight, T. R., Bajt, M. L., Lemasters, J. J., Pessayre, D., & Jaeschke, H. (2005) · The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics · doi:10.1124/jpet.105.088898 · Cited by 373
Metadata
- Authors
- Gujral, J. S.
- Venue
- Toxicological Sciences
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-06-01
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 322-328
- ISSN
- 1096-0929 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2134586772
- Cited by
- 422
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mode of Cell Death after Acetaminophen Overdose in Mice: Apoptosis or Oncotic Necrosis? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/toxsci/67.2.322
- The paper
- Gujral, J. S. (2002). Mode of Cell Death after Acetaminophen Overdose in Mice: Apoptosis or Oncotic Necrosis? Toxicological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/67.2.322
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.