Cited by 75Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicalsPesticide Exposure and ToxicityToxic Organic Pollutants Impact

Pharmacokinetics of Dibutylphthalate in Pregnant Rats

Fennell, Timothy R., Krol, Wojciech L., Sumner, Susan C. J., Snyder, Rodney W.·2004·Toxicological Sciences

Abstract

Dibutylphthalate (DBP) can cause adverse effects on the developing male reproductive tract when administered late in gestation to pregnant rats. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the metabolism of DBP in female rats, and the pharmacokinetics of DBP in pregnant rats on gestational day (g.d.) 20. The identities of DBP metabolites in urine and in maternal and fetal plasma were confirmed by LC-MS/MS, as monobutylphthalate (MBP) and its glucuronide, monohydroxybutylphthalate and its glucuronide, and butanoic acid phthalate and its glucuronide. An LC-MS/MS method was developed for the quantitation of MBP and its glucuronide. MBP and MBP glucuronide were quantitated in maternal and fetal plasma, and in amniotic fluid from pregnant rats administered a single dose of DBP (50, 100, or 250 mg/kg by gavage in corn oil) on g.d. 20. The pharmacokinetics of MBP and MBP glucuronide were determined. MBP was the major metabolite in maternal and fetal plasma. With increasing dose, there was a nonlinear increase in area under the curve (AUC) for MBP, with a ten-fold increase in maternal plasma, and an eight-fold increase in fetal plasma between 50 mg/kg and 250 mg/kg. In amniotic fluid, the major metabolite initially was MBP, but by 24 h after dosing, the major metabolite was MBP glucuronide. Isomers of the MBP glucuronide were detected in amniotic fluid, suggesting acyl group migration, known to occur with acyl glucuronides. This study indicated that MBP, thought to be the active me…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/toxsci/kfh294

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fennell, T. R., Krol, W. L., Sumner, S. C. J., & Snyder, R. W.
Corresponding author
Fennell, Timothy R.
Venue
Toxicological Sciences
Published
2004-09-29
Volume
82
Issue
2
Pages
407-418
ISSN
  • 1096-0929 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-6080
OpenAlex
W2120663473
Cited by
75
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Toxicological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
COMSATS Institute of Information Technology
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
Keywords
dibutyl phthalate, pharmacokinetics, pregnancy, placental transfer, amniotic fluid, fetal plasma, maternal plasma, drug metabolism, dose-dependent metabolism, phthalate metabolites
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Amniotic Fluid, Animals, Biotransformation, Calibration, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Chromatography, Liquid, Dibutyl Phthalate, Female, Half-Life, Phthalic Acids, Pilot Projects, Pregnancy, Pregnancy, Animal, Solutions, Mass Spectrometry, Tissue Distribution, Pharmaceutical Vehicles, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Glucuronides, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review