The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Air-Liquid Interface: Relevant In Vitro Models for Investigating Air Pollutant-Induced Pulmonary Toxicity
Abstract
Air pollution leads to inhalation of several pulmonary stimulants that includes particulate matter, and gaseous substances contributing significantly to the development of chronic lung diseases. However, the pathophysiological mechanism of air pollutant mediated pulmonary toxicity remains unclear. This is primarily due to the lack of efficient test systems, mimicing human inhalation exposure scenarios to air pollutants. The majority of the pulmonary in vitro studies have been conducted using cell lines in submerged cell culture conditions and thereby overlooking the pulmonary physiology. Moreover, submerged cell culture systems lack the possibility to measure effective dose measurements. Particle properties, such as size, surface charge, solubility, transformation, or agglomeration state and chemical properties are altered in solution and are dependent on the composition of cell culture medium. Physiologically relevant in vivo-like in vitro models cultured at air-liquid interface (ALI) is therefore becoming a realistic and efficient tool for lung toxicity testing and cell-cell interaction studies following exposure to aerosolized or gaseous form of air pollutants. Primary bronchial epithelial cells cultured at ALI leads to differentiate into respiratory epithelium consisting of ciliated cells, goblet cells, club cells and basal cells. ALI system is also considered as a feasible approach to implement the "3R principle"-replacement, reduction, and refinement of animal usage in lung toxicity studies. This review discusses the current understanding of relevance, benefits and limitations of the ALI models in comparison to the existing in vitro and in vivo exposure system for testing air pollutants mediated pulmonary toxicity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Monopoli, M. P., Walczyk, D., Campbell, A., Elia, G., Lynch, I., Baldelli Bombelli, F., & Dawson, K. A. (2011) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja107583h · Cited by 1,835
Limbach, L. K., Li, Y., Grass, R. N., Brunner, T. J., Hintermann, M. A., Muller, M., Gunther, D., & Stark, W. J. (2005) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es051043o · Cited by 779
Application of short-term inhalation studies to assess the inhalation toxicity of nanomaterials
Landsiedel, R., Ma-Hock, L., Hofmann, T., Wiemann, M., Strauss, V., Treumann, S., Wohlleben, W., Gröters, S., Wiench, K., & van Ravenzwaay, B. (2014) · Particle and Fibre Toxicology · doi:10.1186/1743-8977-11-16 · Cited by 169
Cited by
Human disease models in drug development
Loewa, A., Feng, J. J., & Hedtrich, S. (2023) · Nature Reviews Bioengineering · doi:10.1038/s44222-023-00063-3 · Cited by 331
Metadata
- Authors
- Upadhyay, S., & Palmberg, L.
- Venue
- Toxicological Sciences
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2018-03-09
- Volume
- 164
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 21-30
- ISSN
- 1096-0929 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-6080
- OpenAlex
- W2793568682
- Cited by
- 292
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 11.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.