Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 232

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Regulation of branch-level gas exchange of boreal trees: roles of shoot water potential and vapor pressure difference

Dang, Q.-L., Margolis, H. A., Coyea, M. R., Sy, M., Collatz, G. J.·1997·Tree Physiology

Abstract

Effects of shoot water potential (Psi) and leaf-to-atmosphere vapor pressure difference (VPD) on gas exchange of jack pine (Pinus banksiana Lamb.), black spruce (Picea mariana (Mill.) B.S.P.), and aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) were investigated at the northern edge of the boreal forest in Manitoba, Canada. Laboratory measurements on cut branches showed that net photosynthesis (A(n)) and mesophyll conductance (g(m)) of jack pine and g(m) of black spruce did not respond to Psi until a threshold Psi was reached below which they decreased linearly. Photosynthesis of black spruce decreased slowly with decreasing Psi above the threshold and declined more rapidly thereafter. The threshold Psi was lower in black spruce than in jack pine. However, stomatal conductance (g(s)) of black spruce decreased continuously with decreasing Psi, whereas g(s) of jack pine showed a threshold response. Mesophyll limitations were primarily responsible for the decline in A(n) at low Psi for jack pine and black spruce in the middle of the growing season, but stomatal limitations became more important later in the season. Field measurements on in situ branches on warm sunny days showed that both conifer species maintained Psi above the corresponding threshold and there was no evidence of Psi limitation on A(n) of jack pine, black spruce or aspen. Vapor pressure difference was important in regulating gas exchange in all three species. An empirical model was used to quantify the g(s) response to VPD. When parameterized with laboratory data for the conifers, the model also fit the corresponding field data. When parameterized with field data, the model showed that stomata of aspen were the most sensitive of the three species to VPD, and stomata of black spruce were the least sensitive. For jack pine and aspen, stomata of foliage in the upper canopy were significantly more sensitive than stomata of foliage in the lower canopy. Vapor pressure difference had a greater impact on A(n) of aspen than on A(n) of the conifers as a result of aspen's greater stomatal sensitivity to VPD and greater slope of the relationship between A(n) and intercellular CO(2) concentration (C(i)). During the 1994 growing season, VPD averaged 1.0 kPa, corresponding to ratios of C(i) to ambient CO(2) of 0.77, 0.71 and 0.81 for jack pine, black spruce and aspen, respectively. We conclude that increases in VPD at the leaf surface in response to climate change should affect the absolute CO(2) and H(2)O fluxes per unit leaf area of the aspen component of a boreal forest landscape more than those of the conifer component.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/treephys/17.8-9.521

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 232

Metadata

Authors
Dang, Q.-L., Margolis, H. A., Coyea, M. R., Sy, M., & Collatz, G. J.
Venue
Tree Physiology
Published
1997-08-01
Volume
17
Issue
8-9
Pages
521-535
ISSN
  • 0829-318X (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-4469
OpenAlex
W1999385849
Cited by
232
References
1
FWCI
14.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Regulation of branch-level gas exchange of boreal trees: roles of shoot water potential and vapor pressure difference. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/treephys/17.8-9.521
The paper
Dang, Q.-L., Margolis, H. A., Coyea, M. R., Sy, M., & Collatz, G. J. (1997). Regulation of branch-level gas exchange of boreal trees: roles of shoot water potential and vapor pressure difference. Tree Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/17.8-9.521

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.