The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Growth and maintenance respiration rates of aspen, black spruce and jack pine stems at northern and southern BOREAS sites
Abstract
We measured stem respiration rates during and after the 1994 growing season of three common boreal tree species at sites near the northern and southern boundaries of the closed-canopy boreal forest in central Canada. The growth respiration coefficient (r(g); carbon efflux per micro mole of carbon incorporated in structural matter) varied between 0.25 and 0.76, and was greatest for black spruce (Picea mariana (Mill.) B.S.P.), least for jack pine (Pinus banksiana Lamb.) and intermediate for trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.). There was a consistent trend for higher r(g) at northern sites than at southern sites. Maintenance respiration rates at 15 degrees C (r(m)) varied from 0.5 to 2.7 nmol C mol(-1) C(sapwood) s(-1). Values of r(m) were high at sapling-stage jack pine sites and mature black spruce sites, and low at mature trembling aspen and mature jack pine sites. We found significant relationships between annual maintenance respiration and sapwood relative growth rate and sapwood volume per unit of stem surface area that explained much of the within-stand and between-stand variability. Because of the large differences in parameter values among sites, we conclude that the use of stand-specific respiratory parameters may improve model predictions of ecosystem process models over the use of generic parameter values.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Observational Contrains on the Global Atmospheric Co 2 Budget
Tans, P. P., Fung, I. Y., & Takahashi, T. (1990) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.247.4949.1431 · Cited by 2,066
Cited by
The McCree-de Wit-Penning de Vries-Thornley respiration paradigms: 30 years later.
Amthor, J. (2000) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1006/anbo.2000.1175 · Cited by 822
BOREAS in 1997: Experiment overview, scientific results, and future directions
Sellers, P. J., Hall, F. G., Kelly, R. D., Black, A., Baldocchi, D., Berry, J., Ryan, M., Ranson, K. J., Crill, P. M., Lettenmaier, D. P., et al. (1997) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/97jd03300 · Cited by 489
Self-citationGifford, R. M. (2003) · Functional Plant Biology · doi:10.1071/fp02083 · Cited by 408
Ryan, M. G., Lavigne, M. B., & Gower, S. T. (1997) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/97jd01236 · Cited by 398
Self-citationAN EXPERIMENTAL TEST OF THE CAUSES OF FOREST GROWTH DECLINE WITH STAND AGE
Ryan, M. G., Binkley, D., Fownes, J. H., Giardina, C. P., & Senock, R. S. (2004) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.1890/03-4037 · Cited by 396
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lavigne, M. B., & Ryan, M. G.
- Venue
- Tree Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1997-08-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 8-9
- Pages
- 543-551
- ISSN
- 0829-318X (ISSN-L)
- 1758-4469
- OpenAlex
- W2095310588
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Growth and maintenance respiration rates of aspen, black spruce and jack pine stems at northern and southern BOREAS sites. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/treephys/17.8-9.543
- The paper
- Lavigne, M. B., & Ryan, M. G. (1997). Growth and maintenance respiration rates of aspen, black spruce and jack pine stems at northern and southern BOREAS sites. Tree Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/17.8-9.543
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.