Photosynthetic characteristics of olive tree (Olea europaea) bark
Abstract
Functional and structural characteristics of corticular photosynthesis of sun-exposed bark of olive tree (Olea europaea L.) were examined. Stomata are only sporadically present during stem primary growth. Light transmission through the phellem was age dependent, decreasing rapidly in stems older than five years of age. Light transmission was also low in pubescent 1-year-old stems. Light transmission was about 50% higher in wet phellem than in dry phellem. Photosynthetic capacity on a unit area basis (measured with an oxygen disc electrode at 27 degrees C and about 5% CO(2) on chlorophyllous tissue discs isolated from the stem) was higher in 1-, 20- and 30-year-old stems compared with 2-10-year-old stems. Low chlorophyll a/b ratio and light compensation points were recorded in olive stems with low phellem light transmission, in accordance with the shade acclimation hypothesis. The intrinsic photochemical efficiency of photosystem II of all stems, especially young stems, was less than that of the leaves. Our results show that olive tree bark possesses an efficient photosynthetic mechanism that may significantly contribute not only to the reduction in concentrations of CO(2) in the inner bark, but also to whole-tree carbon balance.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Olive bark has efficient photosynthetic mechanisms and would likely have been taking up 14C via photosynthesis right up to the time the shrub died, even if the stem below it had ceased growing.
“Indeed as olive bark has been shown to possess efficient photosynthetic mechanisms35 it would likely have been taking up 14C via photosynthesis right up to the time the shrub died (i.e., during the eruption), even if the stem below it had ceased growing.”
From Olive shrub buried on Therasia supports a mid-16th century BCE date for the Thera eruption (2023) · cites this paper as [35]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Olive shrub buried on Therasia supports a mid-16th century BCE date for the Thera eruption
Pearson, C., Sbonias, K., Tzachili, I., & Heaton, T. J. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-33696-w · Cited by 13 · see citing works
- Authors
- Filippou, M., Fasseas, C., & Karabourniotis, G.
- Affiliations
- Agricultural University of Athens (GR)
- ORCID
- Karabourniotis, G.
- Venue
- Tree Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-07-01
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 977-984
- ISSN
- 0829-318X (ISSN-L)
- 1758-4469
- OpenAlex
- W2020358985
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Tree Physiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Surface Properties and Treatments
- Keywords
- Olea europaea, bark, phellem, optical transmittance, photosynthetic capacity, chlorophyll a/b ratio, light compensation point, shade acclimation, photosystem II efficiency, stem age, carbon balance
- MeSH terms
- Chlorophyll A, Chlorophyll, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Photosynthesis, Plant Bark, Olea
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review