CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 111Plant Physiology and Cultivation StudiesIrrigation Practices and Water ManagementEdible Oils Quality and Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Role of carbohydrate reserves in yield production of intensively cultivated oil olive (Olea europaea L.) trees

Bustan, A., Avni, A., Lavee, S., Zipori, I., Yeselson, Y., Schaffer, A. A., Riov, J., Dag, A.·2011·Tree Physiology
DOI 10.1093/treephys/tpr036
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Olive (Olea europaea) has a very high tendency for year-to-year deviation in yield (alternate bearing), which has a negative economic impact on the olive oil industry. Among possible reasons for alternate bearing, depletion of stored carbohydrates (CHO) during the On-year (high yield) has often been mentioned. The objective of the present study was to verify the role of CHO reserves, as a cause or effect, in the alternate bearing of intensively cultivated olives. A monthly survey of soluble sugar and starch concentrations in the leaves, branches, bark and roots of On- and Off-trees (cv. Barnea) was carried out during a complete reproductive cycle from November 2005 to October 2006. Carbohydrate concentration in the sapwood was determined in January, as well as an estimate of whole-tree biomass. The trunk and limbs possess the largest portion of CHO reserves. The influence of reduced fruit load on CHO reserves was also investigated. Starch, mannitol and sucrose concentrations increased from December to March in all tissues, and then declined along with fruit development. Leaves, branches and bark have a significant role in CHO storage, whereas roots accumulated the lowest CHO concentrations. However, fluctuations in reserve content suggested considerable involvement of roots in the CHO budget. Nevertheless, there were no meaningful differences in the annual pattern of CHO concentration between On- and Off-trees. Even a 75-100% reduction in fruit number brought about only a min…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/treephys/tpr036

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 58

  1. 1999, ACTA HORT, 474, 653
  2. 1999, SCIENTIA HORT, 81, 309, 10.1016/S0304-4238(99)00019-9 · DOI
  3. 2011, IRRIG SCI, 29, 253
  4. 2003, J HORT SCI BIOTECHNOL, 78, 303, 10.1080/14620316.2003.11511622 · DOI
  5. Chapin, 1990, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 21, 423, 10.1146/annurev.es.21.110190.002231 · DOI
  6. 2007, Plant and Cell Physiology, 48, 42, 10.1093/pcp/pcl035 · DOI
  7. Conde, 2008, Journal of plant physiology, 165, 1545, 10.1016/j.jplph.2008.04.018 · DOI
  8. 2005, HORT REV, 31, 155
  9. 1973, J AM SOC HORTIC SCI, 98, 591, 10.21273/JASHS.98.6.591 · DOI
  10. 2008, ACTA HORT, 791, 279
  11. 2009, CROP PASTURE SCI, 60, 1124, 10.1071/CP09090 · DOI
  12. 2010, SCIENTIA HORT, 123, 469, 10.1016/j.scienta.2009.11.014 · DOI
  13. De la Rosa, 2000, HortScience, 35, 1223, 10.21273/HORTSCI.35.7.1223 · DOI
  14. 2009, TREES, 23, 247, 10.1007/s00468-008-0272-1 · DOI
  15. 1988, ANNU BOT, 62, 321, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a087664 · DOI
  16. Garcia-Luis, 1995, Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 120, 222, 10.21273/JASHS.120.2.222 · DOI
  17. Goldschmidt, 1999, HortScience, 34, 1020, 10.21273/HORTSCI.34.6.1020 · DOI
  18. 2005, ITALUS HORTUS, 12, 11
  19. 1982, Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 107, 206, 10.21273/JASHS.107.2.206 · DOI
  20. 1985, SCIENTIA HORT, 26, 159, 10.1016/0304-4238(85)90008-1 · DOI
  21. 2000, 210, 636, 10.1007/s004250050054 · DOI
  22. 2010, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 58, 12292, 10.1021/jf102350s · DOI
  23. 2005, Plant, Cell, and Environment (Print), 28, 651, 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2004.01311.x · DOI
  24. 2003, Tree Physiology, 23, 199, 10.1093/treephys/23.3.199 · DOI
  25. 1997, Oikos, 80, 226, 10.2307/3546590 · DOI
  26. Koch, 1996, Annual review of plant biology, 47, 509, 10.1146/annurev.arplant.47.1.509 · DOI
  27. 1992, The Botanical Review, 58, 107, 10.1007/BF02858600 · DOI
  28. 2000, 57, 521, 10.1051/forest:2000139 · DOI
  29. 2004, Plant, Cell, and Environment (Print), 27, 1159, 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2004.01221.x · DOI
  30. 2006, OLEA FAO OLIVE NETWORK, 25, 5
  31. 2001, 58, 469, 10.1051/forest:2001140 · DOI
  32. 2003, Annals of Botany, 92, 137, 10.1093/aob/mcg108 · DOI
  33. 2003, 217, 11, 10.1007/s00425-002-0963-6 · DOI
  34. Marchi, 2005, Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 130, 631, 10.21273/JASHS.130.4.631 · DOI
  35. 2009, Tree Physiology, 29, 1095, 10.1093/treephys/tpp053 · DOI
  36. 1982, HORT REV, 4, 128
  37. 2003, J AMER SOC HORT SCI, 128, 425, 10.21273/JASHS.128.3.0425 · DOI
  38. Naor, 1997, Journal of Experimental Botany, 48, 1675, 10.1093/jxb/48.9.1675 · DOI
  39. 2010, HortScience, 45, S152
  40. 1988, HORT REV, 10, 403
  41. Oliveira, 2002, Plant and Cell Physiology, 43, 1510, 10.1093/pcp/pcf179 · DOI
  42. 1977, J HORT SCI, 52, 105, 10.1080/00221589.1977.11514736 · DOI
  43. 2006, 44, 275, 10.1007/s11099-006-0019-4 · DOI
  44. 2009, CHRON HORT, 49, 15
  45. 1985, Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 110, 574, 10.21273/JASHS.110.4.574 · DOI
  46. 1991, Journal of plant physiology, 138, 189
  47. 2007, Tree Physiology, 27, 881, 10.1093/treephys/27.6.881 · DOI
  48. Smirnoff, 1998, Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 9, 214, 10.1016/S0958-1669(98)80118-3 · DOI
  49. 1976, Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 101, 23, 10.21273/JASHS.101.1.23 · DOI
  50. 2008, Tree Physiology, 28, 207, 10.1093/treephys/28.2.207 · DOI
  51. 1998, ACTA HORT, 470, 341
  52. 1996, Trends in plant science, 1, 139, 10.1016/S1360-1385(96)80048-3 · DOI
  53. 1986, Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 111, 27, 10.21273/JASHS.111.1.27 · DOI
  54. 1999, PLANT SPECIES BIOL, 14, 11, 10.1046/j.1442-1984.1999.00002.x · DOI
  55. 2004, 42, 89, 10.1023/B:GROW.0000014897.22172.7d · DOI
  56. Van Handel, 1968, Analytical biochemistry, 22, 280, 10.1016/0003-2697(68)90317-5 · DOI
  57. 2005, HORT REV, 31, 231
  58. W nsche, 2005, Tree Physiology, 25, 1253, 10.1093/treephys/25.10.1253 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bustan, A., Avni, A., Lavee, S., Zipori, I., Yeselson, Y., Schaffer, A. A., Riov, J., & Dag, A.
Affiliations
  • Agricultural Research Organization (IL)
  • Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
ORCID
Venue
Tree Physiology
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
2011-05-01
Volume
31
Issue
5
Pages
519-530
ISSN
  • 0829-318X (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-4469
DOI
10.1093/treephys/tpr036
OpenAlex
W2153704026
Cited by
111
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 3
FWCI
8.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Tree Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Irrigation Practices and Water Management
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Edible Oils Quality and Analysis
Keywords
olive, Olea europaea, carbohydrate reserves, alternate bearing, fruit set, soluble sugars, starch, mannitol, sucrose, sapwood, tree biomass
MeSH terms
Israel, Mannitol, Seasons, Starch, Sucrose, Plant Leaves, Plant Roots, Plant Stems, Crops, Agricultural, Olea, Carbohydrate Metabolism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review