Cited by 10Global Maternal and Child HealthMaternal and Neonatal HealthcareChild Nutrition and Water Access

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Neonatal mortality in India's rural poor: Findings of a household survey and verbal autopsy study in Rajasthan, Bihar and Odisha

Open access
Dogra, V., Khanna, R., Jain, A., Kumar, A. M. V., Shewade, H. D., Majumdar, S. S.·2015·Journal of Tropical Pediatrics

Abstract

In 2011, Save the Children India launched a project for the disadvantaged population of Rajasthan, Bihar and Odisha. As a baseline activity, neonatal deaths during January-December 2012 were investigated using modified verbal autopsy tool in six sub-district-level administrative units (blocks) adopting 30-cluster sample survey approach. Our study reported a total of 189 neonatal deaths of which 50% occurred at home and 39% happened on Day 1. About half of the deaths occurred in blocks from Bihar. High number of neonatal deaths belonged to households that were below poverty line (64%) and other disadvantaged classes (46%); among mothers who were illiterate (65%), <20 years of age (54%) and during their first-order births (36%). Birth asphyxia was a major cause of neonatal deaths across all blocks. These findings indicate need for easy and early access to transport services, specialized neonatal care and advocacy targeted towards increasing community awareness.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/tropej/fmv013

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. 2014, 14, 357, 10.1186/1471-2393-14-357 · DOI
  2. 2013, LANCET GLOB HEALTH, 1, 219e, 10.1016/S2214-109X(13)70073-1 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 2013, 8, e54865, 10.1371/journal.pone.0054865 · DOI
  4. Baqui, 2006, Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 84, 706, 10.2471/BLT.05.026443 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Shrivastava, 2001, Indian pediatrics, 38, 1022
  6. Liu, 2012, Lancet, 379, 2151, 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60560-1 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 2010, Lancet, 376, 1853, 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61461-4 · DOI
  8. 2012, 2012, 968921
  9. 2013, LANCET GLOB HEALTH, 1, e172, 10.1016/S2214-109X(13)70076-7 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Dogra, V., Khanna, R., Jain, A., Kumar, A. M. V., Shewade, H. D., & Majumdar, S. S.
Affiliations
  • International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease (US)
  • Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
  • Burnet Institute (AU)
Venue
Journal of Tropical Pediatrics
Published
2015-03-29
Volume
61
Issue
3
Pages
210-214
ISSN
  • 0142-6338 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-3664
OpenAlex
W2160838839
Cited by
10
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Tropical Pediatrics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
Keywords
neonatal mortality, rural poverty, verbal autopsy, neonatal asphyxia, maternal illiteracy, maternal age, Rajasthan, Bihar, Odisha
MeSH terms
Autopsy, Cause of Death, Child, Preschool, Delivery of Health Care, Family Characteristics, Female, Humans, India, Infant, Infant Mortality, Infant, Newborn, Operations Research, Rural Population, Cluster Analysis, Health Care Surveys

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review