‘Roads, land use, and deforestation: a spatial model applied to Belize’
Abstract
Rural roads promote economic development, but they also facilitate deforestation. To explore this tradeoff, this article develops a spatially explicit model of land use and estimates probabilities of alternative land uses as a function of land characteristics and distance to market using a multinomial logit specification of this model. Controls are incorporated for the endogeneity of road placement. The model is applied to data for southern Belize, an area experiencing rapid expansion of both subsistence and commercial agriculture, using geographic information system (GIS) techniques to select sample points at 1-kilometer intervals. Market access, land quality, and tenure status affect the probability of agricultural land use synergistically, having differential effects on the likelihood of commercial versus semisubsistence farming. The results suggest that road building in areas with agriculturally poor soils and low population densities may be a “lose-lose” proposition, causing habitat fragmentation and providing low economic returns.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Road density is one of the most relevant determinants of deforestation in the Amazon region.
“Finally, we test for dynamic effects by interacting policies with road density, which has been widely acknowledged as one of the most relevant determinants of deforestation in the Amazon region (Chomitz and Gray, 1996; Angelsen and Kaimowitz, 1999; Pfaff, 1999; Chomitz and Thomas, 2003; Pfaff et al., 2007).”
From The Effect of Rural Credit on Deforestation: Evidence from the Brazilian Amazon (2020) · cites this paper as Chomitz and Gray, 1996
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Deforestation slowdown in the Brazilian Amazon: prices or policies?
Assunção, J., Gandour, C., & Rocha, R. (2015) · Environment and Development Economics · doi:10.1017/s1355770x15000078 · Cited by 305 · see citing works
The Effect of Rural Credit on Deforestation: Evidence from the Brazilian Amazon
Assunção, J., Gandour, C., Rocha, R., & Rocha, R. (2020) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1093/ej/uez060 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
The Economics of Tropical Deforestation
Balboni, C., Berman, A., Burgess, R., & Olken, B. A. (2023) · Annual Review of Economics · doi:10.1146/annurev-economics-090622-024705 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Nkonya, E. M., Pender, J. L., Kaizzi, K. C., Kato, E., Mugarura, S., Ssali, H., Muwonge, J., Nkonya, E. M., Pender, J. L., Kaizzi, K. C., et al. (2008) · Unknown · doi:10.22004/ag.econ.47224 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
- Authors
- Chomitz, K. M., & Gray, D. A.
- Venue
- The World Bank Economic Review
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1996-09-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 487-512
- ISSN
- 0258-6770 (ISSN-L)
- 1564-698X
- OpenAlex
- W2093622053
- Cited by
- 729
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 48
- FWCI
- 9.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The World Bank Economic Review (publishedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- The World Bank Economic Review
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Innovations and Practices
- Keywords
- rural roads, deforestation, land use, market access, commercial agriculture, subsistence farming, land tenure, soil quality, habitat fragmentation, southern Belize
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review