The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Productivity and Turnover in the Export Market: Micro-level Evidence from the Republic of Korea and Taiwan (China)
Abstract
Widespread empirical evidence indicates that exporting producers have higher productivity than nonexporters, although the reasons why are unclear. Some analysts argue that exporters acquire knowledge of new production methods, inputs, and product designs from their international contacts, and with this knowledge they achieve higher productivity than their more insulated domestic counterparts. Others argue that the higher productivity of exporters reflects the self-selection of more efficient producers into a highly competitive export market. This article analyzes the link between a producer's total factor productivity and its decision to participate in the export market, using manufacturing data from the Republic of Korea and Taiwan (China). Differences are found between these two economies in the importance of selection and learning. In Taiwan (China) transitions of plants into and out of the export market reflect systematic variations in productivity as predicted by self-selection models. In Korea there are no significant changes in productivity following entry or exit from the export market that are consistent with learning from exporting. A comparison of the two economies suggests that in Korea factors other than production efficiency are more prominent determinants of the export decision.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Industrial Policy in an Export-Propelled Economy: Lessons from South Korea's Experience
Westphal, L. E. (1990) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.4.3.41 · Cited by 386
Cited by
The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity
Melitz, M. J. (2003) · Econometrica · doi:10.1111/1468-0262.00467 · Cited by 12,309
The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity
Melitz, M. (2002) · doi:10.3386/w8881 · Cited by 2,996
Plants and Productivity in International Trade
Bernard, A. B., Eaton, J., Jensen, J. B., & Kortum, S. (2003) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/000282803769206296 · Cited by 2,980
Exports and Productivity: A Survey of the Evidence from Firm‐level Data
Wagner, J. (2007) · The World Economy · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9701.2007.00872.x · Cited by 1,543
Do exports generate higher productivity? Evidence from Slovenia
De Loecker, J. (2007) · Journal of International Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jinteco.2007.03.003 · Cited by 1,256
Metadata
- Authors
- Aw, B. Y., Chung, S., & Roberts, M. J.
- Venue
- The World Bank Economic Review
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-01-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 65-90
- ISSN
- 0258-6770 (ISSN-L)
- 1564-698X
- OpenAlex
- W1976087595
- Cited by
- 778
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 25.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Productivity and Turnover in the Export Market: Micro-level Evidence from the Republic of Korea and Taiwan (China). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/wber/14.1.65
- The paper
- Aw, B. Y., Chung, S., & Roberts, M. J. (2000). Productivity and Turnover in the Export Market: Micro-level Evidence from the Republic of Korea and Taiwan (China). The World Bank Economic Review. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/14.1.65
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.