The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Introduction: Imperfect Information and Rural Credit Markets—Puzzles and Policy Perspectives
Abstract
Karla Hoff, Joseph E. Stiglitz; Introduction: Imperfect Information and Rural Credit Markets—Puzzles and Policy Perspectives, The World Bank Economic Review, Vo
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Market for "Lemons": Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism
Akerlof, G. A. (1970) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/1879431 · Cited by 23,016
Credit Rationing in Markets with Imperfect Information
Stiglitz, J. E., & Weiss, A. (1981) · Columbia University · doi:10.7916/d8v12ft1 · Cited by 12,769
Self-citation
Cited by
Availability and cost of credit for small businesses: Customer relationships and credit cooperatives
Angelini, P., Di Salvo, R., & Ferri, G. (1998) · Journal of Banking & Finance · doi:10.1016/s0378-4266(98)00008-9 · Cited by 548
Financial Inclusion: Prospects and Challenges in the Nigerian Banking Sector
(2019) · European Journal of Business and Management · doi:10.7176/ejbm/11-20-06 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Hoff, K., & Stiglitz, J. E.
- Venue
- The World Bank Economic Review
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1990
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 235-250
- ISSN
- 0258-6770 (ISSN-L)
- 1564-698X
- OpenAlex
- W2100208018
- Cited by
- 736
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 13.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
