The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
REVIEW: Biofortification of Durum Wheat with Zinc and Iron
Abstract
Micronutrient malnutrition affects over 2 billion people in the developing world. Iron (Fe) deficiency alone affects >47% of all preschool aged children globally, often leading to impaired physical growth, mental development, and learning capacity. Zinc (Zn) deficiency, like iron, is thought to affect billions of people, hampering growth and development, and destroying immune systems. In many micronutrient‐deficient regions, wheat is the dominant staple food making up >50% of the diet. Biofortification, or harnessing the powers of plant breeding to improve the nutritional quality of foods, is a new approach being used to improve the nutrient content of a variety of staple crops. Durum wheat in particular has been quite responsive to breeding for nutritional quality by making full use of the genetic diversity of Fe and Zn concentrations in wild and synthetic parents. Micronutrient concentration and genetic diversity has been well explored under the HarvestPlus biofortification research program, and very positive associations have been confirmed between grain concentrations of protein, Zn, and Fe. Yet some work remains to adequately explain genetic control and molecular mechanisms affecting the accumulation of Zn and Fe in grain. Further, evidence suggests that nitrogen (N) nutritional status of plants can have a positive impact on root uptake and the deposition of micronutrients in seed. Extensive research has been completed on the role of Zn fertilizers in increasing the Zn density of grain, suggesting that where fertilizers are available, making full use of Zn fertilizers can provide an immediate and effective option to increase grain Zn concentration, and productivity in particular, under soil conditions with severe Zn deficiency.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bradford, M. M. (1976) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3 · Cited by 255,302
Cited by
Agronomic biofortification of cereals with zinc: a review
Cakmak, I., & Kutman, U. B. (2018) · European Journal of Soil Science · doi:10.1111/ejss.12437 · Cited by 910
Self-citationBiofortification and Localization of Zinc in Wheat Grain
Cakmak, I., Kalayci, M., Kaya, Y., Torun, A. A., Aydin, N., Wang, Y., Arisoy, Z., Erdem, H., Yazici, A., Gokmen, O., et al. (2010) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf101197h · Cited by 572
Self-citationRamesh, A., Sharma, S. K., Sharma, M. P., Yadav, N., & Joshi, O. P. (2014) · Applied Soil Ecology · doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2013.08.009 · Cited by 416
Food system strategies for preventing micronutrient malnutrition
Miller, B. D. D., & Welch, R. M. (2013) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2013.06.008 · Cited by 366
Meena, V. S., Meena, S. K., Verma, J. P., Kumar, A., Aeron, A., Mishra, P. K., Bisht, J. K., Pattanayak, A., Naveed, M., & Dotaniya, M. L. (2017) · Ecological Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.06.058 · Cited by 316
Metadata
- Authors
- Cakmak, I., Pfeiffer, W. H., & McClafferty, B.
- Venue
- Cereal Chemistry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-01
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 10-20
- ISSN
- 0009-0352 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-3638
- OpenAlex
- W1971076873
- Cited by
- 760
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 33.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: REVIEW: Biofortification of Durum Wheat with Zinc and Iron. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1094/cchem-87-1-0010
- The paper
- Cakmak, I., Pfeiffer, W. H., & McClafferty, B. (2010). REVIEW: Biofortification of Durum Wheat with Zinc and Iron. Cereal Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1094/cchem-87-1-0010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.