The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Textural Comparisons of Gluten‐Free and Wheat‐Based Doughs, Batters, and Breads
Abstract
Studies were conducted with two newly developed gluten‐free bread recipes. One was based on corn starch (relative amount 54), brown rice (25), soya (12.5), and buckwheat flour (8.5), while the other contained brown rice flour (50), skim milk powder (37.5), whole egg (30), potato (25), and corn starch (12.5), and soya flour (12.5). The hydrocolloids used were xanthan gum (1.25) and xanthan (0.9) plus konjac gum (1.5), respectively. Wheat bread and gluten‐free bread made from commercial flour mix were included for comparison. Baking tests showed that wheat and the bread made from the commercial flour mix yielded significantly higher loaf volumes (P < 0.01). All the gluten‐free breads were brittle after two days of storage, detectable by the occurrence of fracture, and the decrease in springiness (P < 0.01), cohesiveness (P < 0.01), and resilience (P < 0.01) derived from texture profile analysis. However, these changes were generally less pronounced for the dairy‐based gluten‐free bread, indicating a better keeping quality. Confocal laser‐scanning microscopy showed that the dairy‐based gluten‐free bread crumb contained network‐like structures resembling the gluten network in wheat bread crumb. It was concluded that the formation of a continuous protein phase is critical for an improved keeping quality of gluten‐free bread.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nutritive value of pseudocereals and their increasing use as functional gluten-free ingredients
Alvarez-Jubete, L., Arendt, E. K., & Gallagher, E. (2010) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2009.10.014 · Cited by 688
Self-citationNutritive value and chemical composition of pseudocereals as gluten-free ingredients
Alvarez-Jubete, L., Arendt, E. K., & Gallagher, E. (2009) · International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/09637480902950597 · Cited by 395
Self-citationNetwork Formation in Gluten‐Free Bread with Application of Transglutaminase
Moore, M. M., Heinbockel, M., Dockery, P., Ulmer, H. M., & Arendt, E. K. (2006) · Cereal Chemistry · doi:10.1094/cc-83-0028 · Cited by 299
Self-citationHager, A.-S., Wolter, A., Czerny, M., Bez, J., Zannini, E., Arendt, E. K., & Czerny, M. (2012) · European Food Research and Technology · doi:10.1007/s00217-012-1763-2 · Cited by 269
Self-citationModification of gluten-free sorghum batter and bread using maize, potato, cassava or rice starch
Onyango, C., Mutungi, C., Unbehend, G., & Lindhauer, M. G. (2011) · LWT - Food Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.lwt.2010.09.006 · Cited by 181
Metadata
- Authors
- Moore, M. M., Schober, T. J., Dockery, P., & Arendt, E. K.
- Venue
- Cereal Chemistry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-09
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 567-575
- ISSN
- 0009-0352 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-3638
- OpenAlex
- W2081464804
- Cited by
- 249
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Textural Comparisons of Gluten‐Free and Wheat‐Based Doughs, Batters, and Breads. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1094/cchem.2004.81.5.567
- The paper
- Moore, M. M., Schober, T. J., Dockery, P., & Arendt, E. K. (2004). Textural Comparisons of Gluten‐Free and Wheat‐Based Doughs, Batters, and Breads. Cereal Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1094/cchem.2004.81.5.567
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.