The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Signaling Pathways Controlling Induced Resistance to Insect Herbivores in Arabidopsis
Abstract
Insect attack triggers changes in transcript level in plants that are mediated predominantly by jasmonic acid (JA). The implication of ethylene (ET), salicylic acid (SA), and other signals in this response is less understood and was monitored with a microarray containing insect- and defense-regulated genes. Arabidopsis thaliana mutants coi1-1, ein2-1, and sid2-1 impaired in JA, ET, and SA signaling pathways were challenged with the specialist small cabbage white (Pieris rapae) and the generalist Egyptian cotton worm (Spodoptera littoralis). JA was shown to be a major signal controlling the upregulation of defense genes in response to either insect but was found to suppress changes in transcript level only in response to P. rapae. Larval growth was affected by the JA-dependent defenses, but S. littoralis gained much more weight on coi1-1 than P. rapae. ET and SA mutants had an altered transcript profile after S. littoralis herbivory but not after P. rapae herbivory. In contrast, both insects yielded similar transcript signatures in the abscisic acid (ABA)-biosynthetic mutants aba2-1 and aba3-1, and ABA controlled transcript levels both negatively and positively in insect-attacked plants. In accordance with the transcript signature, S. littoralis larvae performed better on aba2-1 mutants. This study reveals a new role for ABA in defense against insects in Arabidopsis and identifies some components important for plant resistance to herbivory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical significance for genomewide studies
Storey, J. D., & Tibshirani, R. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1530509100 · Cited by 9,692
Cited by
Role of plant hormones in plant defence responses
Bari, R., & Jones, J. D. G. (2009) · Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1007/s11103-008-9435-0 · Cited by 2,565
Rewiring of the jasmonate signaling pathway in Arabidopsis during insect herbivory
Verhage, A. (2011) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2011.00047 · Cited by 513
Song, S., Huang, H., Gao, H., Wang, J., Wu, D., Liu, X., Yang, S., Zhai, Q., Li, C., Qi, T., et al. (2014) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.113.120394 · Cited by 401
Abscisic Acid Has a Key Role in Modulating Diverse Plant-Pathogen Interactions
Fan, J., Hill, L., Crooks, C., Doerner, P., & Lamb, C. (2009) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.109.137943 · Cited by 356
The roles of methyl jasmonate to stress in plants
Yu, X., Zhang, W., Zhang, Y., Zhang, X., Lang, D., & Zhang, X. (2019) · Functional Plant Biology · doi:10.1071/fp18106 · Cited by 322
Metadata
- Authors
- Bodenhausen, N., & Reymond, P.
- Venue
- Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®
- Publisher
- Scientific Societies
- Published
- 2007-11
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1406-1420
- ISSN
- 0894-0282 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-7706
- OpenAlex
- W2138386293
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 20.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Signaling Pathways Controlling Induced Resistance to Insect Herbivores in Arabidopsis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1094/mpmi-20-11-1406
- The paper
- Bodenhausen, N., & Reymond, P. (2007). Signaling Pathways Controlling Induced Resistance to Insect Herbivores in Arabidopsis. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®. https://doi.org/10.1094/mpmi-20-11-1406
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.