The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Rhizobium sp. Strain NGR234 and R. fredii USDA257 Share Exceptionally Broad, Nested Host Ranges
Open accessAbstract
Genetically, Rhizobium sp. strain NGR234 and R. fredii USDA257 are closely related. Small differences in their nodulation genes result in NGR234 secreting larger amounts of more diverse lipo-oligosaccharidic Nod factors than USDA257. What effects these differences have on nodulation were analyzed by inoculating 452 species of legumes, representing all three subfamilies of the Leguminosae, as well as the nonlegume Parasponia andersonii, with both strains. The two bacteria nodulated P. andersonii, induced ineffective outgrowths on Delonix regia, and nodulated Chamaecrista fasciculata, a member of the only nodulating genus of the Caesalpinieae tested. Both strains nodulated a range of mimosoid legumes, especially the Australian species of Acacia, and the tribe Ingeae. Highest compatibilities were found with the papilionoid tribes Phaseoleae and Desmodieae. On Vigna spp. (Phaseoleae), both bacteria formed more effective symbioses than rhizobia of the “cowpea” (V. unguiculata) miscellany. USDA257 nodulated an exact subset (79 genera) of the NGR234 hosts (112 genera). If only one of the bacteria formed effective, nitrogen-fixing nodules it was usually NGR234. The only exceptions were with Apios americana, Glycine max, and G. soja. Few correlations can be drawn between Nod-factor substituents and the ability to nodulate specific legumes. Relationships between the ability to nodulate and the origin of the host were not apparent. As both P. andersonii and NGR234 originate from Indonesia/Malaysia/Papua New Guinea, and NGR234's preferred hosts (Desmodiinae/ Phaseoleae) are largely Asian, we suggest that broad host range originated in Southeast Asia and spread outward.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
THE ROLE OF ROOT EXUDATES IN RHIZOSPHERE INTERACTIONS WITH PLANTS AND OTHER ORGANISMS
Bais, H. P., Weir, T. L., Perry, L. G., Gilroy, S., & Vivanco, J. M. (2006) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105159 · Cited by 4,682
Diversity of Rhizobium-Phaseolus vulgaris symbiosis: overview and perspectives
Martínez-Romero, E. (2003) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1023/a:1024199013926 · Cited by 1,539
LysM-Type Mycorrhizal Receptor Recruited for Rhizobium Symbiosis in Nonlegume Parasponia
Op den Camp, R., Streng, A., De Mita, S., Cao, Q., Polone, E., Liu, W., Ammiraju, J. S. S., Kudrna, D., Wing, R., Untergasser, A., et al. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1198181 · Cited by 295
Molecular communication in the rhizosphere
Faure, D., Vereecke, D., & Leveau, J. H. J. (2009) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-008-9839-2 · Cited by 199
Metadata
- Authors
- Pueppke, S. G., & Broughton, W. J.
- Venue
- Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®
- Publisher
- Scientific Societies
- Published
- 1999-04
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 293-318
- ISSN
- 0894-0282 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-7706
- OpenAlex
- W2074349461
- Cited by
- 434
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rhizobium sp. Strain NGR234 and R. fredii USDA257 Share Exceptionally Broad, Nested Host Ranges. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1094/mpmi.1999.12.4.293
- The paper
- Pueppke, S. G., & Broughton, W. J. (1999). Rhizobium sp. Strain NGR234 and R. fredii USDA257 Share Exceptionally Broad, Nested Host Ranges. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®. https://doi.org/10.1094/mpmi.1999.12.4.293
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.