The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Arabidopsis thaliana EDS4 Contributes to Salicylic Acid (SA)-Dependent Expression of Defense Responses: Evidence for Inhibition of Jasmonic Acid Signaling by SA
Abstract
The Arabidopsis enhanced disease susceptibility 4 (eds4) mutation causes enhanced susceptibility to infection by the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. Maculicola ES4326 (Psm ES4326). Gene-for-gene resistance to bacteria carrying the avirulence gene avrRpt2 is not significantly affected by eds4. Plants homozygous for eds4 exhibit reduced expression of the pathogenesis-related gene PR-1 after infection by Psm ES4326, weakened responses to treatment with the signal molecule salicylic acid (SA), impairment of the systemic acquired resistance response, and reduced accumulation of SA after infection with Psm ES4326. These phenotypes indicate that EDS4 plays a role in SA-dependent signaling. SA has been shown to have a negative effect on activation of gene expression by the signal molecule jasmonic acid (JA). Two mutations that cause reduced SA levels, eds4 and pad4, cause heightened responses to inducers of JA-dependent gene expression, providing genetic evidence to support the idea that SA interferes with JA-dependent signaling. Two possible working models of the role of EDS4 in governing activation of defense responses are presented.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cross talk between signaling pathways in pathogen defense
Kunkel, B. N., & Brooks, D. M. (2002) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/s1369-5266(02)00275-3 · Cited by 1,451
Li, J., Brader, G., & Palva, E. T. (2004) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.016980 · Cited by 1,207
Turner, J. G., Ellis, C., & Devoto, A. (2002) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.000679 · Cited by 1,157
The complexity of disease signaling in Arabidopsis
Thomma, B. P., Penninckx, I. A., Cammue, B. P., & Broekaert, W. F. (2001) · Current Opinion in Immunology · doi:10.1016/s0952-7915(00)00183-7 · Cited by 718
Plant immunity: the EDS1 regulatory node
Wiermer, M., Feys, B. J., & Parker, J. E. (2005) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2005.05.010 · Cited by 623
Metadata
- Authors
- Gupta, V., Willits, M. G., & Glazebrook, J.
- Venue
- Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®
- Publisher
- Scientific Societies
- Published
- 2000-05
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 503-511
- ISSN
- 0894-0282 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-7706
- OpenAlex
- W2171692846
- Cited by
- 201
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Arabidopsis thaliana EDS4 Contributes to Salicylic Acid (SA)-Dependent Expression of Defense Responses: Evidence for Inhibition of Jasmonic Acid Signaling by SA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1094/mpmi.2000.13.5.503
- The paper
- Gupta, V., Willits, M. G., & Glazebrook, J. (2000). Arabidopsis thaliana EDS4 Contributes to Salicylic Acid (SA)-Dependent Expression of Defense Responses: Evidence for Inhibition of Jasmonic Acid Signaling by SA. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®. https://doi.org/10.1094/mpmi.2000.13.5.503
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.