Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 223

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Selection of a Plant-Bacterium Pair as a Novel Tool for Rhizostimulation of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon-Degrading Bacteria

Open access
Kuiper, Irene, Bloemberg, Guido V., Lugtenberg, Ben J. J.·2001·Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®

Abstract

We developed a novel procedure for the selection of a microbe-plant pair for the stable and efficient degradation of naphthalene. Based on the rationale that root exudate is the best nutrient source available in soil, the grass (Lolium multiflorum) cultivar Barmultra was selected because of its abilities to produce a highly branched root system, root deeply, and carry a high population of Pseudomonas spp. bacteria on its roots. Starting with a mixture of total rhizobacteria from grass-like vegetation collected from a heavily polluted site and selecting for stable naphthalene degradation as well as for efficient root colonization, Pseudomonas putida strain PCL1444 was isolated. The strain's ability to degrade naphthalene was shown to be stable in the rhizosphere. Moreover, it had superior root-colonizing properties because, after the inoculation of grass seedlings, it appeared to colonize the root tip up to 100-fold better than the efficient root colonizer Pseudomonas fluorescens WCS365. Strain PCL1444 uses root exudate as the dominant nutrient source because the presence of grass seedlings in soil results in up to a 10-fold increase of PCL1444 cells. Moreover, the root colonized by strain PCL1444 was able to penetrate through an agar layer, resulting in the degradation of naphthalene underneath this layer. In addition, the inoculation of grass seeds or seedlings with PCL1444 protected them against naphthalene phytotoxicity. Finally, this plant-microbe combination appeared able to degrade naphthalene from soil that was heavily polluted with a complex mixture of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. To our knowledge, this is the first time that a naturally occurring bacterium has been selected for the combination of the abilities to degrade a pollutant and colonize plant roots. We suggest that the principle described here, to select a bacterium which combines efficient root colonization with a beneficial activity, also can be used to improve the selection of other more efficient plant-bacterium pairs for beneficial purposes such as biocontrol, biofertilization, and phytostimulation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1094/mpmi.2001.14.10.1197

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 223

Metadata

Authors
Kuiper, I., Bloemberg, G. V., & Lugtenberg, B. J. J.
Venue
Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®
Published
2001-10
Volume
14
Issue
10
Pages
1197-1205
ISSN
  • 0894-0282 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-7706
OpenAlex
W2155308155
Cited by
223
References
0
FWCI
8.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Selection of a Plant-Bacterium Pair as a Novel Tool for Rhizostimulation of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon-Degrading Bacteria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1094/mpmi.2001.14.10.1197
The paper
Kuiper, I., Bloemberg, G. V., & Lugtenberg, B. J. J. (2001). Selection of a Plant-Bacterium Pair as a Novel Tool for Rhizostimulation of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon-Degrading Bacteria. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®. https://doi.org/10.1094/mpmi.2001.14.10.1197

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.