The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparison of Benefit to Sugarcane Plant Growth and 15N2 Incorporation Following Inoculation of Sterile Plants with Acetobacter diazotrophicus Wild-Type and Nif¯ Mutant Strains
Abstract
The ability of the nitrogen-fixing bacterial endophyte Acetobacter diazotrophicus strain PAl5 to enhance the growth of sugarcane SP70-1143 was evaluated in the growth chamber, greenhouse, and field by comparing plants inoculated with wild-type and Nif¯ mutant MAd3A in two independent experiments. The wild-type and Nif¯ mutant strains colonized sugarcane plants equally and persisted in mature plants. In N-deficient conditions, sugarcane plants inoculated with A. diazotrophicus PAl5 generally grew better and had a higher total N content 60 days after planting than did plants inoculated with mutant MAd3A or uninoculated plants. These results indicate that the transfer of fixed N from A. diazotrophicus to sugarcane might be a significant mechanism for plant growth promotion in this association. When N was not limiting, growth enhancement was observed in plants inoculated with either wild-type or Nif¯ mutants, suggesting the additional effect of a plant growth promoting factor provided by A. diazotrophicus. A 15 N 2 incorporation experiment demonstrated that A. diazotrophicus wild-type strains actively fixed N 2 inside sugarcane plants, whereas the Nif¯ mutants did not.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Elbeltagy, A., Nishioka, K., Sato, T., Suzuki, H., Ye, B., Hamada, T., Isawa, T., Mitsui, H., & Minamisawa, K. (2001) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.67.11.5285-5293.2001 · Cited by 470
Van Deynze, A., Zamora, P., Delaux, P.-M., Heitmann, C., Jayaraman, D., Rajasekar, S., Graham, D., Maeda, J., Gibson, D., Schwartz, K. D., et al. (2018) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.2006352 · Cited by 396
Use of nitrogen-fixing bacteria as biofertiliser for non-legumes: prospects and challenges
Bhattacharjee, R. B., Singh, A., & Mukhopadhyay, S. N. (2008) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-008-1567-2 · Cited by 344
Regulation of Enteric Endophytic Bacterial Colonization by Plant Defenses
Iniguez, A. L., Dong, Y., Carter, H. D., Ahmer, B. M. M., Stone, J. M., & Triplett, E. W. (2005) · Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions® · doi:10.1094/mpmi-18-0169 · Cited by 293
Fouts, D. E., Tyler, H. L., DeBoy, R. T., Daugherty, S., Ren, Q., Badger, J. H., Durkin, A. S., Huot, H., Shrivastava, S., Kothari, S., et al. (2008) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000141 · Cited by 293
Metadata
- Authors
- Sevilla, M., Burris, R. H., Gunapala, N., & Kennedy, C.
- Venue
- Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®
- Publisher
- Scientific Societies
- Published
- 2001-03
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 358-366
- ISSN
- 0894-0282 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-7706
- OpenAlex
- W2084799733
- Cited by
- 356
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of Benefit to Sugarcane Plant Growth and 15N2 Incorporation Following Inoculation of Sterile Plants with Acetobacter diazotrophicus Wild-Type and Nif¯ Mutant Strains. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1094/mpmi.2001.14.3.358
- The paper
- Sevilla, M., Burris, R. H., Gunapala, N., & Kennedy, C. (2001). Comparison of Benefit to Sugarcane Plant Growth and 15N2 Incorporation Following Inoculation of Sterile Plants with Acetobacter diazotrophicus Wild-Type and Nif¯ Mutant Strains. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®. https://doi.org/10.1094/mpmi.2001.14.3.358
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.