The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Azoarcus Grass Endophytes Contribute Fixed Nitrogen to the Plant in an Unculturable State
Open accessAbstract
The extent to which the N 2-fixing bacterial endophyte Azoarcus sp. strain BH72 in the rhizosphere of Kallar grass can provide fixed nitrogen to the plant was assessed by evaluating inoculated plants grown in the greenhouse and uninoculated plants taken from the natural environment. The inoculum consisted of either wild-type bacteria or nifK¯ mutant strain BHNKD4. In N 2-deficient conditions, plants inoculated with strain BH72 (N 2-fixing test plants) grew better and accumulated more nitrogen with a lower δ 15 N signature after 8 months than did plants inoculated with the mutant strain (non-N 2-fixing control plants). Polyadenylated or polymerase chain reaction-amplified BH72 nifH transcripts were retrieved from test but not from control plants. BH72 nifH transcripts were abundant. The inocula could not be reisolated. These results indicate that Azoarcus sp. BH72 can contribute combined N 2 to the plant in an unculturable state. Abundant BH72 nifH transcripts were detected also in uninoculated plants taken from the natural environment, from which Azoarcus sp. BH72 also could not be isolated. Quantification of nitrogenase gene transcription indicated a high potential of strain BH72 for biological N 2 fixation in association with roots. Phylogenetic analysis of nitrogenase sequences predicted that uncultured grass endophytes including Azoarcus spp. are ecologically dominant and play an important role in N 2-fixation in natural grass ecosystems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Structure and functions of the bacterial microbiota of plants
Bulgarelli, D., Schlaeppi, K., Spaepen, S., van Themaat, E. V. L., & Schulze-Lefert, P. (2013) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-050312-120106 · Cited by 3,308
Compant, S., Clément, C., & Sessitsch, A. (2010) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.11.024 · Cited by 2,318
Van Deynze, A., Zamora, P., Delaux, P.-M., Heitmann, C., Jayaraman, D., Rajasekar, S., Graham, D., Maeda, J., Gibson, D., Schwartz, K. D., et al. (2018) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.2006352 · Cited by 396
Use of nitrogen-fixing bacteria as biofertiliser for non-legumes: prospects and challenges
Bhattacharjee, R. B., Singh, A., & Mukhopadhyay, S. N. (2008) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-008-1567-2 · Cited by 344
MITRA, D., MONDAL, R., KHOSHRU, B., SENAPATI, A., RADHA, T. K., MAHAKUR, B., UNIYAL, N., MYO, E. M., BOUTAJ, H., SIERRA, B. E. G., et al. (2022) · Pedosphere · doi:10.1016/s1002-0160(21)60042-5 · Cited by 281
Metadata
- Authors
- Hurek, T., Handley, L. L., Reinhold-Hurek, B., & Piché, Y.
- Venue
- Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®
- Publisher
- Scientific Societies
- Published
- 2002-03
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 233-242
- ISSN
- 0894-0282 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-7706
- OpenAlex
- W2082676268
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Azoarcus Grass Endophytes Contribute Fixed Nitrogen to the Plant in an Unculturable State. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1094/mpmi.2002.15.3.233
- The paper
- Hurek, T., Handley, L. L., Reinhold-Hurek, B., & Piché, Y. (2002). Azoarcus Grass Endophytes Contribute Fixed Nitrogen to the Plant in an Unculturable State. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®. https://doi.org/10.1094/mpmi.2002.15.3.233
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.