Cited by 18Plant-Microbe Interactions and ImmunitySoil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsLegume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Switchgrass Rhizosphere Metabolite Chemistry Driven by Nitrogen Availability

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Plants and soil microorganisms interact closely in the rhizosphere where plants may exchange carbon (C) for functional benefits from the microbial community. For example, the bioenergy crop, switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) is thought to exchange root-exuded C for nitrogen (N) fixed by diazotrophs (free-living N-fixers). However, this interaction is not well characterized and it is not known how or if switchgrass responds to diazotrophs or their activity. To explore this question, we assessed rhizosphere metabolite chemistry of switchgrass grown in a hydroponic system under two N levels and under inoculated or uninoculated conditions. Plants were grown with the inoculum Azotobacter vinelandii DJ for 3 days before harvest. We found switchgrass root exudate chemistry to be driven by N availability. Total metabolite concentrations were generally greater under high N versus low N and unaffected by inoculation. Examination of rhizosphere chemical fingerprints indicates metabolite chemistry was also driven strongly by N availability with a greater relative abundance of carbohydrates under high N and greater relative abundance of organic acids under low N. We also found evidence of changes in rhizosphere chemical fingerprints by inoculation treatment. However, we found little evidence of N treatment and inoculation interaction effects that suggests this response is not directly mediated by N availability. [Formula: see text] Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1094/pbiomes-09-19-0055-fi

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. 10.1016/S1360-1385(00)01688-5 · DOI
  2. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105159 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1128/AEM.02091-14 · DOI
  4. 10.1007/s11104-014-2186-6 · DOI
  5. 10.1023/A:1026290508166 · DOI
  6. 10.1073/pnas.1800155115 · DOI
  7. Fox J., 2018, An R Companion to Applied Regression
  8. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.53.091401.110929 · DOI
  9. 10.1038/s41598-018-30150-0 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/0038-0717(83)90037-8 · DOI
  11. 10.1007/s11104-009-9925-0 · DOI
  12. 10.1080/00380768.1967.10431982 · DOI
  13. 10.1080/07352680500316433 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102710-145034 · DOI
  15. 10.1371/journal.pone.0197320 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.11.006 · DOI
  17. 10.1046/j.0016-8025.2001.00790.x · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.tplants.2017.09.003 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)50480-X · DOI
  20. 10.1128/AEM.02103-19 · DOI
  21. 10.1007/s11104-019-04307-3 · DOI
  22. Sterner R. W., 2002, Ecological Stoichiometry: The Biology of Elements from Molecules to the Biosphere
  23. 10.3390/metabo4030599 · DOI
  24. 10.1128/JB.01405-07 · DOI
  25. 10.1128/AEM.03565-12 · DOI
  26. 10.1111/pce.12218 · DOI
  27. 10.1146/annurev-phyto-102313-045933 · DOI
  28. 10.1021/ac060209g · DOI
  29. 10.1146/annurev-micro-090110-102815 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Smercina, D. N., Bowsher, A. W., Evans, S. E., Friesen, M. L., Eder, E. K., Hoyt, D. W., & Tiemann, L. K.
Affiliations
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • Washington State University (US)
  • Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (US)
Venue
Phytobiomes Journal
Published
2021-01
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
88-96
ISSN
2471-2906 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3010294298
Cited by
18
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4
FWCI
1.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Phytobiomes Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Biological and Environmental Research (DE-SC0014108, DE-SC0018409, DE-FC02-07ER64494, DE-AC02-05CH11231, DE-AC05-76RL01830)
  • National Science Foundation Long-Term Ecological Research Program (DEB 1832042)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis
Keywords
switchgrass, rhizosphere metabolites, nitrogen availability, root exudates, Azotobacter vinelandii, nitrogen-fixing bacteria, nitrogen fixation, plant-microbe interactions, organic acids, carbohydrates, energy crops, hydroponics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review