The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Switchgrass Rhizosphere Metabolite Chemistry Driven by Nitrogen Availability
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Plants and soil microorganisms interact closely in the rhizosphere where plants may exchange carbon (C) for functional benefits from the microbial community. For example, the bioenergy crop, switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) is thought to exchange root-exuded C for nitrogen (N) fixed by diazotrophs (free-living N-fixers). However, this interaction is not well characterized and it is not known how or if switchgrass responds to diazotrophs or their activity. To explore this question, we assessed rhizosphere metabolite chemistry of switchgrass grown in a hydroponic system under two N levels and under inoculated or uninoculated conditions. Plants were grown with the inoculum Azotobacter vinelandii DJ for 3 days before harvest. We found switchgrass root exudate chemistry to be driven by N availability. Total metabolite concentrations were generally greater under high N versus low N and unaffected by inoculation. Examination of rhizosphere chemical fingerprints indicates metabolite chemistry was also driven strongly by N availability with a greater relative abundance of carbohydrates under high N and greater relative abundance of organic acids under low N. We also found evidence of changes in rhizosphere chemical fingerprints by inoculation treatment. However, we found little evidence of N treatment and inoculation interaction effects that suggests this response is not directly mediated by N availability. [Formula: see text] Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license .
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cellulosic biofuel contributions to a sustainable energy future: Choices and outcomes
Robertson, G. P., Hamilton, S. K., Barham, B. L., Dale, B. E., Izaurralde, R. C., Jackson, R. D., Landis, D. A., Swinton, S. M., Thelen, K. D., & Tiedje, J. M. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aal2324 · Cited by 440
Nitrogen fertilization challenges the climate benefit of cellulosic biofuels
Ruan, L., Bhardwaj, A. K., Hamilton, S. K., & Robertson, G. P. (2016) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/11/6/064007 · Cited by 85
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 29
- 10.1016/S1360-1385(00)01688-5 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105159 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1128/AEM.02091-14 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11104-014-2186-6 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1026290508166 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1800155115 · DOI
- Fox J., 2018, An R Companion to Applied Regression
- 10.1146/annurev.arplant.53.091401.110929 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41598-018-30150-0 · DOI
- 10.1016/0038-0717(83)90037-8 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11104-009-9925-0 · DOI
- 10.1080/00380768.1967.10431982 · DOI
- 10.1080/07352680500316433 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102710-145034 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0197320 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.11.006 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.0016-8025.2001.00790.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tplants.2017.09.003 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)50480-X · DOI
- 10.1128/AEM.02103-19 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11104-019-04307-3 · DOI
- Sterner R. W., 2002, Ecological Stoichiometry: The Biology of Elements from Molecules to the Biosphere
- 10.3390/metabo4030599 · DOI
- 10.1128/JB.01405-07 · DOI
- 10.1128/AEM.03565-12 · DOI
- 10.1111/pce.12218 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev-phyto-102313-045933 · DOI
- 10.1021/ac060209g · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev-micro-090110-102815 · DOI · Paper page
Metadata
- Authors
- Smercina, D. N., Bowsher, A. W., Evans, S. E., Friesen, M. L., Eder, E. K., Hoyt, D. W., & Tiemann, L. K.
- Affiliations
- Michigan State University (US)
- Washington State University (US)
- Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Phytobiomes Journal
- Publisher
- Scientific Societies
- Published
- 2021-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 88-96
- ISSN
- 2471-2906 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3010294298
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4
- FWCI
- 1.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- Phytobiomes Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Biological and Environmental Research (DE-SC0014108, DE-SC0018409, DE-FC02-07ER64494, DE-AC02-05CH11231, DE-AC05-76RL01830)
- National Science Foundation Long-Term Ecological Research Program (DEB 1832042)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis
- Keywords
- switchgrass, rhizosphere metabolites, nitrogen availability, root exudates, Azotobacter vinelandii, nitrogen-fixing bacteria, nitrogen fixation, plant-microbe interactions, organic acids, carbohydrates, energy crops, hydroponics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review