Cited by 83Plant Pathogens and Fungal DiseasesFungal Plant Pathogen ControlYeasts and Rust Fungi Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Identification and Characterization of Colletotrichum Species Associated with Mango Anthracnose in Guangxi, China

Open access

Abstract

Mango (Mangifera indica) is widely grown across southern China, especially in the provinces of Guangxi, Hainan, Yunnan, Sichuan, and Taiwan. Guangxi itself has over 86,667 ha of mango production. The purpose of this study was to identify Colletotrichum species associated with mango in different parts of Guangxi and examine their pathogenicity on leaves and fruits of mango in vitro. Diseased leaves were collected from 25 mango orchards in different areas of Guangxi province. Sixty-five isolates were obtained from mango leaves with anthracnose symptoms, and these were further characterized based on morphology and DNA sequencing. Twenty-nine isolates from different areas were selected for sequencing and analyses of the internal transcribed spacer region, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, partial actin, β-tubulin, and chitin synthase genomic regions. The most common fungal isolates were these three species: Colletotrichum asianum, C. fructicola, and C. siamense. C. asianum was the most common and widely distributed in Guangxi (51.7%), followed by C. fructicola (37.9%) and C. siamense (10.2%), both found in Tiandong, Tianyang, and Wuming counties. There was no evidence of geographical specialization of the different species. Pathogenicity assays showed that all isolates were pathogenic to mango leaves and fruit (cultivar Tainong). No relationship was found between origin of isolates and their virulence. This is the first description of C. asianum, C. fructicola, and C. siamense as causal agents of mango leaf anthracnose from Guangxi province, China.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1094/pdis-09-17-1516-re

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Cai L., 2009, Fungal Divers., 39, 183
  3. 10.3114/sim0014 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.2307/3761358 · DOI
  5. 10.1094/PHYTO.2000.90.6.608 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1128/aem.61.4.1323-1330.1995 · DOI
  7. 10.2307/3762016 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1016/j.gene.2015.10.041 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Hu M., 2005, Southw. China J. Agric. Sci., 18, 306
  10. Hyde K. D., 2009, Fungal Divers., 39, 183
  11. Jayasinghe C. K., 2009, Ceylon J. Sci. Biol. Sci., 38, 31
  12. Li R. W., 2013, J. South. Agric., 44, 875
  13. 10.1094/PDIS-08-16-1130-PDN · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1023/A:1015678432355 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Nelson S. C., 2008, Mango Anthracnose (Colletotrichum gloeosporiodes). Publication PD-48
  16. 10.1007/BF02464387 · DOI
  17. 10.1111/ppa.12410 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1016/j.myc.2012.07.006 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Photita W., 2005, Fungal Divers., 18, 117
  20. 10.1007/s13225-010-0046-0 · DOI
  21. 10.1094/PDIS-09-16-1244-PDN · DOI
  22. 10.1094/PDIS-08-13-0837-PDN · DOI
  23. Taylor B. H., 1993, Methods in Plant Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, 37
  24. 10.1016/0378-1119(92)90055-T · DOI
  25. 10.1007/s10658-010-9606-0 · DOI
  26. 10.1007/s13225-014-0293-6 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.3114/sim0011 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1016/B978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 83

Metadata

Authors
Mo, J., Zhao, G., Li, Q., Solangi, G. S., Tang, L., Guo, T., Huang, S., & Hsiang, T.
Affiliations
  • Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Science (CN)
  • Department of Guangxi Forestry Pest Management, Nanning, Guangxi, 530028, China
  • University of Guelph (CA)
Venue
Plant Disease
Published
2018-07
Volume
102
Issue
7
Pages
1283-1289
ISSN
  • 0191-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-7692
OpenAlex
W2781704321
Cited by
83
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 7
FWCI
4.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Plant Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (31600029, 31560526)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi Province (2016GXNSFCB380004)
  • Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies
Keywords
mango anthracnose, Colletotrichum, Colletotrichum asianum, Colletotrichum fructicola, Colletotrichum siamense, mango, leaf anthracnose, pathogenicity, fungal identification, Guangxi, new host record
MeSH terms
China, DNA, Fungal, Fruit, Geography, Phylogeny, Plant Diseases, Plant Proteins, Species Specificity, Virulence, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Plant Leaves, Colletotrichum, Mangifera, Host-Pathogen Interactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review