Cited by 24Plant Pathogens and Fungal DiseasesYeasts and Rust Fungi StudiesFungal Plant Pathogen Control

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

First Report of Anthracnose of Mangifera indica Caused by Colletotrichum scovillei in China

Abstract

Mango anthracnose caused by Colletotrichum spp. is a constraint for sustainable mango (Mangifera indica L.) production. During May 2013, anthracnose symptoms were detected on mango leaves (cultivar Tainong No. 1) in Guangxi, China, which appeared on tender leaves as point-sized, red-brown to black, sunken spots that enlarged to circular or irregular lesions with a red halo, turning yellow as the leaves became older. Under unfavorable conditions, spots turned black but did not enlarge; rather, diseased leaves frequently became distorted and wrinkled. Tissue pieces (5 × 5 mm) were cut from infected leaves and soaked in 75% ethanol for 10 s, followed by 2 min in 0.1% HgCl₂, rinsing with sterile water, and plating onto potato dextrose agar (PDA). Of the 65 Colletotrichum strains isolated during our 3-year survey (2011 to 2013), a novel Colletotrichum culture (strain QZ7L) was obtained from an infected leaf sample of Lingshan county (22°24′59″N, 109°17′27″E). The strain was purified by single-spore isolation and incubated on PDA at 25°C under continuous fluorescent light irradiation, producing white to pale gray colonies with dense aerial mycelia. The reverse side of the colony was pale yellowish to olive. Conidia were hyaline, unicellular, straight, cylindrical, with both ends slightly round or one end round and the other slightly pointed, measuring 7.6 to 15.8 (average 10.3) × 3.0 to 4.7 (average 3.8) µm (n = 50). Appressoria were single, subglobose, ovate to clavate, light brown to dark black, 5.9 to 10 (average 7.9) × 4.5 to 7.8 (average 5.7) µm (n = 50). Morphological characteristics of the strain matched those of Colletotrichum scovillei (Damm et al. 2012). DNA of strain QZ7L was amplified with primers for three DNA loci—the internal transcribed spacer region of ribosomal DNA and two genes (glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase and actin) —using primer pairs ITS1/ITS4, GDF1/GDR1, and ACT-512F/ACT783R, respectively (Qin et al. 2018), and the resulting sequences were submitted to the European Nucleotide Archive with accession numbers LT632569, LT632591, and LT632580, respectively. A concatenated maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree was built using MEGA 6.06. Strain QZ7L clustered with C. scovillei, clearly separating from other Colletotrichum spp. Conidial suspensions (10⁶ spores/ml) were used to inoculate the entire surface of attached tender leaves (cultivar Tainong No. 1) using a sterilized paintbrush and incubated at ambient temperature. Symptoms appeared after 3 days and were similar to those observed on naturally infected plants. The uninoculated controls remained symptomless. C. scovillei was reisolated from the lesions of inoculated leaves, fulfilling Koch’s postulates. C. acutatum, C. gloeosporioides, C. asianum, C. fructicola, and C. siamense were reported as causal agents of anthracnose on mango in China (Hu et al. 2012; Qin et al. 2017, 2018). C. scovillei was reported as a pathogen causing diseases on pepper (Damm et al. 2012) and banana (Zhou et al. 2017). This is the first report of C. scovillei causing anthracnose on mango in China. Although C. scovillei was found to be a rare species of Colletotrichum responsible for anthracnose on mango in this work, a tracking survey on the pathogen should be done for sustainable production of mango in the future.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1094/pdis-11-18-1980-pdn

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. 10.3114/sim0010 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Hu M. J., 2012, J. Fruit Sci., 29, 105
  3. 10.1094/PDIS-09-16-1244-PDN · DOI
  4. Qin L. P., 2018, J. Fruit Sci., 35, 469
  5. 10.1094/PDIS-08-16-1135-PDN · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Qin, L. P., Zhang, Y., Su, Q., Chen, Y. L., Nong, Q., Xie, L., Yu, G. M., & Huang, S. L.
Affiliations
  • Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Science (CN)
  • Xinlianxin Chemical Fertilizer Ltd., Xinxiang 453731, Henan, China; and
  • Nanyang Normal University (CN)
Venue
Plant Disease
Published
2019-05
Volume
103
Issue
5
Pages
1043
ISSN
  • 0191-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-7692
OpenAlex
W2976541817
Cited by
24
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3
FWCI
1.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Plant Disease (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi (2013GXNSFAA019064)
  • Science and Technology Development Foundation of Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences (Gui Nong Ke 2017JM34)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
Keywords
anthracnose, mango, Colletotrichum scovillei, plant pathogenic fungi, first report, China

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review