The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Induction of Systemic Resistance Against Fusarium Wilt of Radish by Lipopolysaccharides of Pseudomonas fluorescens
Abstract
In commercial greenhouse trials, Pseudomonas fluorescens strain WCS374 suppressed Fusarium wilt and increased radish yield. In bioassays, the involvement of lipopolysaccharides (LPSs) in induction of systemic resistance was studied. Induction of systemic resistance by selected plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) strains of P. fluorescens was involved in the suppression of Fusarium wilt of radish in a special rockwool bioassay. In this bioassay, the pathogen, Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. raphani, and the PGPR strain were inoculated at spatially separate locations on the plant root and were confined to these locations throughout the experiments. PGPR strains WCS374 and WCS417 of P. fluorescens and their crude cell wall extracts, which contained the LPS or purified LPS (consisting of lipid A/innercore/O-antigen side chain), induced systemic resistance, whereas P putida WCS358 or its crude or purified LPS did not. Neither the phage-resistant mutants of WCS374 and WCS417 lacking the O-antigenic side chain of the LPS nor the crude or purified lipid A/innercore of these mutants reduced disease incidence in this experimental design. Strain WCS374, but not its O-antigen-minus mutant, also induced systemic resistance when applied on the cotyledon of radish on an agar disk cut from a plate culture. The pathogen was delivered on the root in peat 2 days later. Thus, the resistance-inducing O-antigen of strain WCS374 was effective not only onto the root, but also on the cotyledon. In a bioassay with greenhouse soil naturally infested with the Fusarium wilt pathogen of radish, strain WCS374, but not the O-antigen-minus mutant, suppressed disease. This suggests the involvement of induced resistance in natural soil bioassays and commercial greenhouse trials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Compant, S., Duffy, B., Nowak, J., Clément, C., & Barka, E. A. (2005) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.71.9.4951-4959.2005 · Cited by 2,640
SYSTEMIC RESISTANCE INDUCED BY RHIZOSPHERE BACTERIA
van Loon, L. C., Bakker, P. A. H. M., & Pieterse, C. M. J. (1998) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.36.1.453 · Cited by 2,361
Microbial interactions and biocontrol in the rhizosphere
Whipps, J. M. (2001) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jexbot/52.suppl_1.487 · Cited by 1,934
Priming: Getting Ready for Battle
Conrath, U., Beckers, G. J. M., Flors, V., García-Agustín, P., Jakab, G., Mauch, F., Newman, M.-A., Pieterse, C. M. J., Poinssot, B., Pozo, M. J., et al. (2006) · Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions® · doi:10.1094/mpmi-19-1062 · Cited by 1,532
Plant responses to plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria
van Loon, L. C. (2007) · European Journal of Plant Pathology · doi:10.1007/s10658-007-9165-1 · Cited by 913
Metadata
- Authors
- Leeman, M.
- Venue
- Phytopathology
- Publisher
- Scientific Societies
- Published
- 1995
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1021
- ISSN
- 0031-949X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2027539291
- Cited by
- 339
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Induction of Systemic Resistance Against Fusarium Wilt of Radish by Lipopolysaccharides of Pseudomonas fluorescens. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1094/phyto-85-1021
- The paper
- Leeman, M. (1995). Induction of Systemic Resistance Against Fusarium Wilt of Radish by Lipopolysaccharides of Pseudomonas fluorescens. Phytopathology. https://doi.org/10.1094/phyto-85-1021
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.