Cited by 56Fungal Plant Pathogen ControlPlant Pathogens and Fungal DiseasesPlant Disease Resistance and Genetics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Identification and Characterization of Benomyl-Resistant and -Sensitive Populations of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides from Statice ( Limonium spp.)

Abstract

Sixty-four isolates of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides were isolated from infected Limonium spp. cultivated in 12 different locations in Israel. All isolates were identified as belonging to the C. gloeosporioides complex by species-specific primers. Of these isolates, 46 were resistant to benomyl at 10 μg/ml and 18 were sensitive to this concentration of fungicide. Based on arbitrarily primed polymerase chain reaction of all isolates and internal transcribed spacer-1 sequence analyses of 12 selected isolates, the benomyl-resistant and -sensitive populations belong to two distinct genotypes. Sequence analyses of the β-tubulin genes, TUB1 and TUB2, of five sensitive and five resistant representative isolates of C. gloeosporioides from Limonium spp. revealed that the benomyl-resistant isolates had an alanine substitute instead of a glutamic acid at position 198 in TUB2. All data suggest that the resistant and sensitive genotypes are two independent and separate populations. Because all Limonium plant propagation material is imported from various geographic regions worldwide, and benomyl is not applied to this crop or for the control of Colletotrichum spp. in Israel, it is presumed that plants are bearing quiescent infections from the points of origin prior to arrival.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1094/phyto-96-0542

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A point mutation in a β-tubulin gene can change the amino acid sequence at the benzimidazole binding site, resulting in fungal resistance to benomyl.

    “The amino acid sequence at the benzimidazole binding site can change because of a point mutation in a β-tubulin gene resulting in fungal resistance to benomyl (Maymon et al., 2006).”

    From Mango anthracnose disease: the current situation and direction for future research (2023) · cites this paper as Maymon et al., 2006

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. 10.1094/PHYTO.2003.93.5.579 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/S0885-5765(05)80104-3 · DOI
  3. 10.1006/pest.1999.2406 · DOI
  4. Bar Lavan Y., 2004, Phytoparasitica, 32, 188
  5. 10.1128/aem.60.11.4155-4159.1994 · DOI
  6. 10.1046/j.1365-3059.1996.d01-109.x · DOI
  7. 10.1007/BF00351486 · DOI
  8. 10.1007/BF00282784 · DOI
  9. 10.1094/Phyto-83-1199 · DOI
  10. 10.1083/jcb.72.1.174 · DOI
  11. Engelhard A. W., 1975, Plant Dis. Rep., 59, 551
  12. Engelhard A. W., 1972, Plant Dis. Rep., 56, 894
  13. 10.1094/PHYTO.1997.87.5.516 · DOI
  14. 10.1094/PHYTO.2000.90.6.608 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1006/emyc.1993.1029 · DOI
  16. 10.1006/pmpp.1996.0062 · DOI
  17. 10.1007/BF00276886 · DOI
  18. 10.1080/00275514.1992.12026122 · DOI
  19. Gupta, M., and Filner, P. 1991. Microsatellites amplify highly polymorphic DNA bands in SPAR of plant DNA. Abstr. 1705 in: Proc. Int. Soc. Plant Mol. Biol., Tucson, AZ.
  20. Jayasinghe C. K., 2000, Int. J. Trop. Plant Dis., 18, 77
  21. 10.1002/cm.970220304 · DOI
  22. Kagiwata T., 1986, J. Agric. Sci. Jpn., 31, 101
  23. 10.1080/07060660309507001 · DOI
  24. 10.1094/Phyto-82-1348 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/S0953-7562(09)80797-1 · DOI
  26. 10.1093/nar/gkh293 · DOI
  27. 10.1128/AEM.69.12.7145-7152.2003 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/0378-1119(87)90283-6 · DOI
  29. 10.1017/S095375629700542X · DOI
  30. 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2003.02061.x · DOI
  31. Nam M. H., 1996, Korean J. Plant Pathol., 12, 395
  32. 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90350-1 · DOI
  33. 10.1128/MCB.6.7.2452 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/0378-1119(90)90275-V · DOI
  35. Pivonia S., 2000, Phytoparasitica, 28, 286
  36. 10.1016/0147-5975(91)90025-9 · DOI
  37. Sakoda T., 2003, Japan. Res. Bull. Plant Prot. Ser. Jpn., 39, 103
  38. 10.1016/S0953-7562(09)80527-3 · DOI
  39. 10.1094/Phyto-63-193 · DOI
  40. Weising, K., Weigand, F., Driesel, A. J., Kahl, A. J., Zischer, H., and Epplen, J. T. 1989. Polymorphic simple GATA/GACA repeats in plant genomes. (Abstr.) Nucleic Acids Res. 17:10128. · DOI
  41. Yan K., 1996, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 62, 3053, 10.1128/aem.62.8.3053-3056.1996 · DOI
  42. 10.1094/Phyto-83-1478 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Maymon, M., Zveibil, A., Pivonia, S., Minz, D., & Freeman, S.
Venue
Phytopathology®
Published
2006-05
Volume
96
Issue
5
Pages
542-548
ISSN
  • 0031-949X (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-7684
OpenAlex
W2061024142
Cited by
56
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Phytopathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics
Keywords
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, benomyl resistance, fungicide resistance, Limonium, beta-tubulin, ITS region, species-specific primers, quiescent infection, imported plant material, fungal population genetics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review