The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Epiphytic Bacteria and Yeasts on Apple Blossoms and Their Potential as Antagonists of Erwinia amylovora
Abstract
Apple blossoms were sampled for indigenous epiphytic populations of culturable microorganisms during different stages of bloom at two locations in central Washington State and one site in Corvallis, OR. Frequencies and population sizes of bacteria on stigmas of apple were lower in Washington than at Corvallis, where average relative humidity was higher and possibly favored greater colonization; however, bacteria at Corvallis were mainly pseudomonads, whereas those in Washington were diverse, composed of several genera. In Washington, yeast as well as bacteria were isolated from both stigmatic and hypanthial surfaces. Sampled blossoms were processed immediately to assess microbial populations, or after a 24-h incubation at 28 degrees C and high relative humidity, which broadened the range of detectable taxa evaluated as potential antagonists. Identifications were based on fatty acid methyl ester profiles and rDNA sequence analyses. Yeasts or yeastlike organisms were detected at frequencies similar to or greater than bacteria, particularly in hypanthia. When microbial isolates were tested for their capacity to suppress Erwinia amylovora on stigmas of detached crab apple flowers, many were ineffective. The best antagonists were the bacteria Pantoea agglomerans and Pseudomonas spp. and a few yeasts identified as Cryptococcus spp. Further evaluation of these taxa on flowers could lead to the discovery of additional biocontrol agents for fire blight.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In agriculture, yeasts have been identified as powerful antagonists of fungal pathogens causing postharvest and storage diseases and of microorganisms attacking flowers and leaves.
“In agriculture, yeasts have been identified as powerful antagonists of fungal pathogens causing postharvest and storage diseases and of microorganisms attacking flowers and leaves [25–31].”
From Competition assays and physiological experiments of soil and phyllosphere yeasts identify Candida subhashii as a novel antagonist of filamentous fungi (2017) · cites this paper as [27]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 62
- Amann R. I., 1995, Microbiol. Rev., 59, 143, 10.1128/mr.59.1.143-169.1995 · DOI
- Andrews, J. H. 1985. Strategies for selecting antagonistic microorganisms from the phylloplane. Pages 31-44 in: Biological Control on the Phylloplane. C. Windels and S. E. Lindow, eds. American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, MN.
- 10.1146/annurev.phyto.38.1.145 · DOI
- 10.1139/b80-109 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.93.2415.354 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.py.33.090195.001045 · DOI
- Billing, E. 2000. Fire blight risk assessment systems and models. Pages 235-252 in: Fire Blight: The Disease and Its Causative Agent, Erwinia amylovora. J. L. Vanneste, ed. CAB International, Wallingford, UK. · DOI
- 10.17660/ActaHortic.2006.704.47 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10658-004-1423-x · DOI
- Cabrefiga J., 2007, Int. Microbiol., 10, 123
- 10.1128/JCM.39.11.4042-4051.2001 · DOI
- 10.1094/Phyto-80-934 · DOI
- 10.17660/ActaHortic.2006.704.55 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1439-0434.1991.tb00146.x · DOI
- Environmental Protection Agency, 2006, DC. Federal Register, 71, 24590
- Environmental Protection Agency, 2006, DC. Federal Register, 71, 54928
- Epton, H.A.S., Wilson, M., Nicholson, S. L., and Sigee, D.C. 1994. Biological control of Erwinia amylovora with Erwinia herbicola. Pages 335-352 in: Ecology of Plant Pathogens. J. P. Blakeman and B. Williamson, eds. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.
- 10.1094/Phyto-74-1342 · DOI
- 10.1094/Phyto-78-746 · DOI
- Ivanoff S. S., 1941, J. Agric. Res., 62, 733
- 10.17660/ActaHortic.2008.793.60 · DOI
- Johnson, K. B., and Stockwell, V. O. 2000. Biological control of fire blight. Pages 319-337 in: Fire Blight: The Disease and Its Causative Agent, Erwinia amylovora. J. L. Vanneste, ed. CAB International, Wallingford, UK. · DOI
- 10.1094/Phyto-83-995 · DOI
- 10.1094/PDIS.2004.88.1.41 · DOI
- Lane, D. J. 1991. 16S/23S rRNA sequencing. Pages 115-147 in: Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematics. E. Stackebrandt and M. Goodfellow, eds. Wiley, New York.
- 10.1094/PD-66-327 · DOI
- Lindow, S. E. 1985. Integrated control and role of antibiosis in biological control of fire blight and frost injury. Pages 83-115 in: Biological Control on the Phylloplane. C. Windels and S. E. Lindow, eds. The American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, MN.
- 10.1128/AEM.69.4.1875-1883.2003 · DOI
- 10.1094/Phyto-86-841 · DOI
- 10.1094/Phyto-78-1366 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1439-0434.1988.tb00964.x · DOI
- 10.1094/PHYTO.2002.92.12.1300 · DOI
- 10.1094/Phyto-84-627 · DOI
- 10.1094/Phyto-86-940 · DOI
- 10.1006/bcon.2001.0957 · DOI
- Miller L., 1985, Hewlett-Packard Application Note, 228
- 10.1094/Phyto-81-113 · DOI
- Psallidas, P. G., and Tsiantos, J. 2000. Chemical control of fire blight. Pages 199-234 in: Fire Blight: The Disease and Its Causative Agent, Erwinia amylovora. J. L. Vanneste, ed. CAB International, Wallingford, UK. · DOI
- 10.1094/PHYTO.1997.87.11.1096 · DOI
- 10.1094/PHYTO.1999.89.1.39 · DOI
- Pusey P. L., 1999, United States Patent, 919
- 10.1094/PHYTO.2000.90.12.1352 · DOI
- 10.1094/PDIS.2002.86.6.639 · DOI
- 10.1094/PHYTO.2004.94.8.901 · DOI
- 10.21273/HORTSCI.43.5.1471 · DOI
- Raaijmakers J., 1997, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 63, 881, 10.1128/aem.63.3.881-887.1997 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF01998090 · DOI
- 10.1094/PD-75-1110 · DOI
- 10.17660/ActaHortic.1999.489.73 · DOI
- 10.1094/Phyto-86-834 · DOI
- 10.1094/PHYTO.1999.89.12.1162 · DOI
- 10.17660/ActaHortic.2008.793.75 · DOI
- 10.1094/PD-90-1399 · DOI
- 10.1094/Phyto-76-476 · DOI
- Thomson, S. V. 2000. Epidemiology of fire blight. Pages 9-36 in: Fire Blight: The Disease and Its Causative Agent, Erwinia amylovora. J. L. Vanneste, ed. CAB International, Wallingford, UK. · DOI
- 10.17660/ActaHortic.2002.590.33 · DOI
- 10.17660/ActaHortic.1996.411.61 · DOI
- White, T. J., Bruns, T, Lee, S., and Taylor, J. W. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. Pages 315-322 in: PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications. M. A. Innis, D. H. Gelfand, J. J. Sninsky, and T. J. White, eds. Academic Press, New York. · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1365-3059.1990.tb02507.x · DOI
- 10.1094/Phyto-82-914 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1994.tb01658.x · DOI
- 10.1094/Phyto-63-1075 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hilber-Bodmer, M., Schmid, M., Ahrens, C. H., & Freimoser, F. M. (2017) · BMC Microbiology · doi:10.1186/s12866-016-0908-z · Cited by 106
Metadata
- Authors
- Pusey, P. L., Stockwell, V. O., & Mazzola, M.
- Affiliations
- Agricultural Research Service (US)
- Corresponding author
- Pusey, P. Lawrence
- Venue
- Phytopathology®
- Publisher
- Scientific Societies
- Published
- 2009-05
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 571-581
- ISSN
- 0031-949X (ISSN-L)
- 1943-7684
- OpenAlex
- W2100088846
- Cited by
- 107
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 6.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Phytopathology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Phytoplasmas and Hemiptera pathogens
- Keywords
- epiphytic bacteria, epiphytic yeasts, apple blossom, Erwinia amylovora, fire blight, biological control, antagonistic microorganisms, Pantoea agglomerans, Pseudomonas, Cryptococcus, stigma (botany), hypanthium, relative humidity, biological control agents
- MeSH terms
- Bacteria, Environment, Oregon, Washington, Weather, Yeasts, Malus, Flowers, Erwinia amylovora
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review