Cited by 107Plant Pathogenic Bacteria StudiesPlant-Microbe Interactions and ImmunityPhytoplasmas and Hemiptera pathogens

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Epiphytic Bacteria and Yeasts on Apple Blossoms and Their Potential as Antagonists of Erwinia amylovora

Abstract

Apple blossoms were sampled for indigenous epiphytic populations of culturable microorganisms during different stages of bloom at two locations in central Washington State and one site in Corvallis, OR. Frequencies and population sizes of bacteria on stigmas of apple were lower in Washington than at Corvallis, where average relative humidity was higher and possibly favored greater colonization; however, bacteria at Corvallis were mainly pseudomonads, whereas those in Washington were diverse, composed of several genera. In Washington, yeast as well as bacteria were isolated from both stigmatic and hypanthial surfaces. Sampled blossoms were processed immediately to assess microbial populations, or after a 24-h incubation at 28 degrees C and high relative humidity, which broadened the range of detectable taxa evaluated as potential antagonists. Identifications were based on fatty acid methyl ester profiles and rDNA sequence analyses. Yeasts or yeastlike organisms were detected at frequencies similar to or greater than bacteria, particularly in hypanthia. When microbial isolates were tested for their capacity to suppress Erwinia amylovora on stigmas of detached crab apple flowers, many were ineffective. The best antagonists were the bacteria Pantoea agglomerans and Pseudomonas spp. and a few yeasts identified as Cryptococcus spp. Further evaluation of these taxa on flowers could lead to the discovery of additional biocontrol agents for fire blight.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1094/phyto-99-5-0571

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 62

  1. Amann R. I., 1995, Microbiol. Rev., 59, 143, 10.1128/mr.59.1.143-169.1995 · DOI
  2. Andrews, J. H. 1985. Strategies for selecting antagonistic microorganisms from the phylloplane. Pages 31-44 in: Biological Control on the Phylloplane. C. Windels and S. E. Lindow, eds. American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, MN.
  3. 10.1146/annurev.phyto.38.1.145 · DOI
  4. 10.1139/b80-109 · DOI
  5. 10.1126/science.93.2415.354 · DOI
  6. 10.1146/annurev.py.33.090195.001045 · DOI
  7. Billing, E. 2000. Fire blight risk assessment systems and models. Pages 235-252 in: Fire Blight: The Disease and Its Causative Agent, Erwinia amylovora. J. L. Vanneste, ed. CAB International, Wallingford, UK. · DOI
  8. 10.17660/ActaHortic.2006.704.47 · DOI
  9. 10.1007/s10658-004-1423-x · DOI
  10. Cabrefiga J., 2007, Int. Microbiol., 10, 123
  11. 10.1128/JCM.39.11.4042-4051.2001 · DOI
  12. 10.1094/Phyto-80-934 · DOI
  13. 10.17660/ActaHortic.2006.704.55 · DOI
  14. 10.1111/j.1439-0434.1991.tb00146.x · DOI
  15. Environmental Protection Agency, 2006, DC. Federal Register, 71, 24590
  16. Environmental Protection Agency, 2006, DC. Federal Register, 71, 54928
  17. Epton, H.A.S., Wilson, M., Nicholson, S. L., and Sigee, D.C. 1994. Biological control of Erwinia amylovora with Erwinia herbicola. Pages 335-352 in: Ecology of Plant Pathogens. J. P. Blakeman and B. Williamson, eds. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.
  18. 10.1094/Phyto-74-1342 · DOI
  19. 10.1094/Phyto-78-746 · DOI
  20. Ivanoff S. S., 1941, J. Agric. Res., 62, 733
  21. 10.17660/ActaHortic.2008.793.60 · DOI
  22. Johnson, K. B., and Stockwell, V. O. 2000. Biological control of fire blight. Pages 319-337 in: Fire Blight: The Disease and Its Causative Agent, Erwinia amylovora. J. L. Vanneste, ed. CAB International, Wallingford, UK. · DOI
  23. 10.1094/Phyto-83-995 · DOI
  24. 10.1094/PDIS.2004.88.1.41 · DOI
  25. Lane, D. J. 1991. 16S/23S rRNA sequencing. Pages 115-147 in: Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematics. E. Stackebrandt and M. Goodfellow, eds. Wiley, New York.
  26. 10.1094/PD-66-327 · DOI
  27. Lindow, S. E. 1985. Integrated control and role of antibiosis in biological control of fire blight and frost injury. Pages 83-115 in: Biological Control on the Phylloplane. C. Windels and S. E. Lindow, eds. The American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, MN.
  28. 10.1128/AEM.69.4.1875-1883.2003 · DOI
  29. 10.1094/Phyto-86-841 · DOI
  30. 10.1094/Phyto-78-1366 · DOI
  31. 10.1111/j.1439-0434.1988.tb00964.x · DOI
  32. 10.1094/PHYTO.2002.92.12.1300 · DOI
  33. 10.1094/Phyto-84-627 · DOI
  34. 10.1094/Phyto-86-940 · DOI
  35. 10.1006/bcon.2001.0957 · DOI
  36. Miller L., 1985, Hewlett-Packard Application Note, 228
  37. 10.1094/Phyto-81-113 · DOI
  38. Psallidas, P. G., and Tsiantos, J. 2000. Chemical control of fire blight. Pages 199-234 in: Fire Blight: The Disease and Its Causative Agent, Erwinia amylovora. J. L. Vanneste, ed. CAB International, Wallingford, UK. · DOI
  39. 10.1094/PHYTO.1997.87.11.1096 · DOI
  40. 10.1094/PHYTO.1999.89.1.39 · DOI
  41. Pusey P. L., 1999, United States Patent, 919
  42. 10.1094/PHYTO.2000.90.12.1352 · DOI
  43. 10.1094/PDIS.2002.86.6.639 · DOI
  44. 10.1094/PHYTO.2004.94.8.901 · DOI
  45. 10.21273/HORTSCI.43.5.1471 · DOI
  46. Raaijmakers J., 1997, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 63, 881, 10.1128/aem.63.3.881-887.1997 · DOI
  47. 10.1007/BF01998090 · DOI
  48. 10.1094/PD-75-1110 · DOI
  49. 10.17660/ActaHortic.1999.489.73 · DOI
  50. 10.1094/Phyto-86-834 · DOI
  51. 10.1094/PHYTO.1999.89.12.1162 · DOI
  52. 10.17660/ActaHortic.2008.793.75 · DOI
  53. 10.1094/PD-90-1399 · DOI
  54. 10.1094/Phyto-76-476 · DOI
  55. Thomson, S. V. 2000. Epidemiology of fire blight. Pages 9-36 in: Fire Blight: The Disease and Its Causative Agent, Erwinia amylovora. J. L. Vanneste, ed. CAB International, Wallingford, UK. · DOI
  56. 10.17660/ActaHortic.2002.590.33 · DOI
  57. 10.17660/ActaHortic.1996.411.61 · DOI
  58. White, T. J., Bruns, T, Lee, S., and Taylor, J. W. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. Pages 315-322 in: PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications. M. A. Innis, D. H. Gelfand, J. J. Sninsky, and T. J. White, eds. Academic Press, New York. · DOI · Paper page
  59. 10.1111/j.1365-3059.1990.tb02507.x · DOI
  60. 10.1094/Phyto-82-914 · DOI
  61. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1994.tb01658.x · DOI
  62. 10.1094/Phyto-63-1075 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Pusey, P. L., Stockwell, V. O., & Mazzola, M.
Affiliations
Agricultural Research Service (US)
Corresponding author
Pusey, P. Lawrence
Venue
Phytopathology®
Published
2009-05
Volume
99
Issue
5
Pages
571-581
ISSN
  • 0031-949X (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-7684
OpenAlex
W2100088846
Cited by
107
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
FWCI
6.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Phytopathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Phytoplasmas and Hemiptera pathogens
Keywords
epiphytic bacteria, epiphytic yeasts, apple blossom, Erwinia amylovora, fire blight, biological control, antagonistic microorganisms, Pantoea agglomerans, Pseudomonas, Cryptococcus, stigma (botany), hypanthium, relative humidity, biological control agents
MeSH terms
Bacteria, Environment, Oregon, Washington, Weather, Yeasts, Malus, Flowers, Erwinia amylovora

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review