The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Importance of Different Pathways for Maize Kernel Infection by Fusarium moniliforme
Abstract
The relative importance of several infection pathways (silks, stalks, and seed) leading to kernel infection of maize hybrids by Fusarium moniliforme was investigated in field experiments in 1993 and 1994. Systemic movement of specific fungal strains within plants was detected by using vegetative compatibility as a marker. Transmission of F. moniliforme from inoculated seed to stalks and developing kernels was detected in two of three field experiments; the seed-inoculated strain was detected in kernels on approximately 10% of ears. The percentage of kernels infected with the seed-inoculated strain ranged from 0 to 70%, with a mean of 0 to 2.5% (0 to 8.3% of F. moniliforme-infected kernels). Other pathways to kernel infection were more effective than seed transmission and systemic infection. F. moniliforme strains inoculated into the crowns and stalks of plants were found throughout the stalks and in up to 95% of the kernels in individual plants. Infection through the silks was clearly the most effective pathway to kernel infection. This was the only inoculation method that significantly increased overall incidence of F. moniliforme infection in kernels; the silk-inoculated strain infected up to 100% of the kernels in individual ears, with a treatment mean as high as 83.7% of kernels. When plants were silk-inoculated, the percentage of kernels infected by other F. moniliforme strains from the seed or stalk was reduced, apparently due to competition among strains. This study provides evidence that systemic development of F. moniliforme from maize seed and stalk infections can contribute to kernel infection, but silk infection is a more important pathway for this fungus to reach the kernels.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Epidemiology of Fusarium Diseases and their Mycotoxins in Maize Ears
Munkvold, G. P. (2003) · European Journal of Plant Pathology · doi:10.1023/a:1026078324268 · Cited by 389
Self-citationAbbas, H. K., Zablotowicz, R. M., Weaver, M. A., Shier, W. T., Bruns, H. A., Bellaloui, N., Accinelli, C., & Abel, C. A. (2013) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf400754g · Cited by 61
Evolution of fungal populations in corn silage conserved under polyethylene or biodegradable films
Spadaro, D., Bustos-Lopez, M. P., Gullino, M. L., Piano, S., Tabacco, E., & Borreani, G. (2015) · Journal of Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1111/jam.12852 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Munkvold, G. P., McGee, D. C., & Carlton, W. M.
- Venue
- Phytopathology®
- Publisher
- Scientific Societies
- Published
- 1997-02
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 209-217
- ISSN
- 0031-949X (ISSN-L)
- 1943-7684
- OpenAlex
- W1969431780
- Cited by
- 251
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Importance of Different Pathways for Maize Kernel Infection by Fusarium moniliforme. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1094/phyto.1997.87.2.209
- The paper
- Munkvold, G. P., McGee, D. C., & Carlton, W. M. (1997). Importance of Different Pathways for Maize Kernel Infection by Fusarium moniliforme. Phytopathology®. https://doi.org/10.1094/phyto.1997.87.2.209
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.