The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Pseudomonas syringae Responds to the Environment on Leaves by Cell Size Reduction
Abstract
The length and volume of cells of the plant-pathogenic bacterium Pseudomonas syringae strain B728a were measured in vitro and with time after inoculation on bean leaf surfaces to assess both the effect of nutrient availability on the cell size of P. syringae and, by inference, the variability in nutrient availability in the leaf surface habitat. Cells of P. syringae harboring a green fluorescent protein marker gene were visualized by epifluorescence microscopy after recovery from leaves or culture and their size was estimated by analysis of captured digital images. The average cell length of bacteria grown on leaves was significantly smaller than that of cultured cells, and approached that of cells starved in phosphate buffer for 24 h. The average length of cells originally grown on King's medium B decreased from ≈ 2.5 to ≈ 1.2 μm by 7 days after inoculation on plants. Some decrease in cell size occurred during growth of cells on leaves and continued for up to 13 days after cell multiplication ceased. Although cultured cells exhibited a normal size distribution, the size of cells recovered from bean plants at various times after inoculation was strongly right-hand skewed and was described by a log-normal distribution. The skewness of the size distribution tended to increase with time after inoculation. The reduced cell size of P. syringae B728a on plants was readily reversible when recovered cells were grown in culture. Direct in situ measurements of cell sizes on leaves confirmed that most cells of P. syringae respond to the leaf environment by reducing their size. The spatial heterogeneity of cell sizes observed on leaves suggest that nutrient availability is quite variable on the leaf surface environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The cell shortening observed here has not previously been reported in response to fluoride but has been observed in Pseudomonas syringae under starvation stress conditions (47).”
From Recombinant Pseudomonas growing on non-natural fluorinated substrates shows stress but overall tolerance to cytoplasmically released fluoride anion (2024) · cites this paper as [47]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 52
- 10.1094/Phyto-81-648 · DOI
- Bae H. C., 1973, J. Bacteriol., 113, 1462, 10.1128/jb.113.3.1462-1473.1973 · DOI
- Baker L. R., 1983, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 46, 930, 10.1128/aem.46.4.930-940.1983 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02011247 · DOI
- 10.1128/jb.170.1.452-455.1988 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.py.33.090195.001045 · DOI
- 10.1094/PHYTO.1999.89.5.353 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2000.01130.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1999.tb08737.x · DOI
- 10.1016/S0966-842X(99)01607-8 · DOI
- 10.3354/meps057207 · DOI
- 10.1128/jb.176.16.4816-4824.1994 · DOI
- 10.1128/jb.176.1.7-14.1994 · DOI
- Godfrey, B. E. S. 1976. Leachates from aerial parts of plants and their relation to plant surface microbial populations. Pages 433-439 in: Microbiology of Aerial Plant Surfaces. C. H. Dickinson and T. H. Preece, eds. Academic Press, London. · DOI
- 10.1128/jb.168.2.486-493.1986 · DOI
- 10.1094/PHYTO.2001.91.4.415 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0038-0717(99)00036-X · DOI
- 10.1094/Phyto-77-1078 · DOI
- 10.1128/MMBR.64.3.624-653.2000 · DOI
- Humphreys B., 1983, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 45, 43, 10.1128/aem.45.1.43-47.1983 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00871228 · DOI
- Koch A. L., 1984, J. Bacteriol., 159, 919, 10.1128/jb.159.3.919-924.1984 · DOI
- 10.1128/jb.173.14.4474-4481.1991 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.061629598 · DOI
- 10.1094/Phyto-74-1334 · DOI
- Lisle J. T., 1998, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 64, 4658, 10.1128/AEM.64.12.4658-4662.1998 · DOI
- 10.1094/Phyto-77-1449 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00166029 · DOI
- 10.1128/AEM.66.1.369-374.2000 · DOI
- Moriarty, D. J. W., and Bell, R. T. 1993. Bacterial growth and starvation in aquatic environments. Pages 25-53 in: Starvation in Bacteria. S. Kjelleberg, ed. Plenum Press, New York. · DOI
- Morita, R. Y. (ed.) 1997. Bacteria in Oligotrophic Environments: Starvation-Survival Lifestyle. Chapman & Hall, Inc., New York.
- Morris C. E., 1997, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 63, 1570, 10.1128/aem.63.4.1570-1576.1997 · DOI
- Morris, C. E., and Rouse, D. I. 1985. Role of nutrients in regulating epiphytic bacterial populations. Pages 63-82 in: Biological Control on the Phylloplane. C. E. Windels and S. E. Lindow, eds. The American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, MN.
- Novitsky J. A., 1976, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 32, 617, 10.1128/aem.32.4.617-622.1976 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1988.tb02672.x · DOI
- Roszak D. B., 1987, Microbiol. Rev., 51, 365, 10.1128/mr.51.3.365-379.1987 · DOI
- 10.1094/Phyto-75-505 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1439-0434.1989.tb01063.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1439-0434.1993.tb01358.x · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02010479 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1574-6941.1997.tb00396.x · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.pp.21.060170.001513 · DOI
- 10.1016/0077-7579(90)90060-T · DOI
- 10.1016/0077-7579(88)90052-X · DOI
- Van Overbeek L. S., 1995, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 61, 4202, 10.1128/aem.61.12.4202-4208.1995 · DOI
- Watson S. P., 1998, J. Bacteriol., 180, 1750, 10.1128/JB.180.7.1750-1758.1998 · DOI
- Wiebe W. J., 1992, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 58, 359, 10.1128/aem.58.1.359-364.1992 · DOI
- 10.1128/AEM.65.4.1435-1443.1999 · DOI
- Wilson M., 1993, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 59, 410, 10.1128/aem.59.2.410-416.1993 · DOI
- Wilson M., 1994, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 60, 3128, 10.1128/aem.60.9.3128-3137.1994 · DOI
- 10.1128/AEM.60.12.4468-4477.1994 · DOI
- Wilson M., 1995, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 61, 2151, 10.1128/aem.61.6.2151-2158.1995 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dodge, A. G., Thoma, C. J., O’Connor, M. R., & Wackett, L. P. (2024) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.02785-23 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Monier, J.-M., & Lindow, S. E.
- Venue
- Phytopathology®
- Publisher
- Scientific Societies
- Published
- 2003-10
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1209-1216
- ISSN
- 0031-949X
- 1943-7684
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review