Cited by 78Plant-Microbe Interactions and ImmunityFungal Plant Pathogen ControlPlant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases

Characterization of the Exoglucanase-Encoding Gene PaEXG2 and Study of Its Role in the Biocontrol Activity of Pichia anomala Strain K

Open access
Grevesse, Cathy, Lepoivre, Philippe, Jijakli, Mohamed Haïssam·2003·Phytopathology®

Abstract

The PaEXG2 gene, encoding an exo-β-1,3-glucanase, was isolated from the biocontrol agent Pichia anomala strain K. PaEXG2 has the capacity for coding an acidic protein of 427 amino acids with a predicted molecular weight of 45.7 kDa, a calculated pI of 4.7, and one potential N-glycosylation site. PaEXG2 was disrupted by the insertion of the URA3 marker gene, encoding orotidine monophosphate decarboxylase in strain KU1, a uracil auxotroph derived from strain K. Strain KU1 showed inferior biocontrol activity and colonization of wounds on apples, compared to the prototrophic strain. Antagonism and colonization were recovered after the restoration of prototrophy by transformation with the URA3 gene. Integrative transformation was shown to be mostly ectopic in strain K descendants (only 4% of integration by homologous recombination). PaEXG2 disruption abolished all detectable extracellular exo-β-1,3-glucanase activity in vitro and in situ but did not affect biocontrol of Botrytis cinerea on wounded apples.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1094/phyto.2003.93.9.1145

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Wickerhamomyces anomalus, the deletion of the two exo-β-glucanases (PaEXG1 and PaEXG2) significantly reduced biocontrol activity on fruits against Botrytis cinerea, while the single deletion of PaEXG2 did not reduce biocontrol performance.

    “In Wickerhamomyces anomalus (Pichia anomala), the deletion of the two exo-β-glucanases (PaEXG1 and PaEXG2) significantly reduced biocontrol activity on fruits against Botrytis cinerea (Friel et al. 2007), while the single deletion of PaEXG2 did not reduce biocontrol performance (Grevesse et al. 2003).”

    From Biocontrol yeasts: mechanisms and applications (2019) · cites this paper as Grevesse et al. 2003

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 33 · Cited by 78

Authors
Grevesse, C., Lepoivre, P., & Jijakli, M. H.
Affiliations
  • Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech (BE)
  • University of Liège (BE)
Venue
Phytopathology®
Published
2003-09
Volume
93
Issue
9
Pages
1145-1152
ISSN
  • 0031-949X (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-7684
OpenAlex
W1992688427
Cited by
78
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Phytopathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ORBi (University of Liège) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
Keywords
exo-β-1,3-glucanase, Wickerhamomyces anomalus, biological control, Botrytis cinerea, wound colonization, apple, gene disruption, prototrophy, antagonism, N-glycosylation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review