Cited by 204Endometriosis Research and TreatmentReproductive System and PregnancyEpigenetics and DNA Methylation

Experimental Murine Endometriosis Induces DNA Methylation and Altered Gene Expression in Eutopic Endometrium1

Open access
Lee, Banghyun, Du, Hongling, Taylor, Hugh S.·2009·Biology of Reproduction

Abstract

The eutopic endometrium in women with endometriosis demonstrates diminished endometrial receptivity and altered gene expression. It is unknown if the endometrium being defective gives rise to a predisposition toward endometriosis and infertility or, alternatively, if endometriosis causes the altered endometrial receptivity. Here we created experimental endometriosis in mice and examined the expression of several markers of endometrial receptivity in the eutopic endometrium. Methylation of Hoxa10 was also evaluated as a potential mechanism responsible for altered gene expression. Expression of each gene was measured using quantitative real-time RT-PCR at 14 wk after induction of endometriosis. Expression of Hoxa10 and Hoxa11, which are necessary for endometrial receptivity, were decreased in the endometriosis group. Insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 (Igfbp1) mRNA was decreased in the endometriosis group. However, there was no change in Integrin beta3 (Itgb3) mRNA expression. Total progesterone receptor (Pgr-AB) was increased in the endometriosis group and the ratio of Pgr-B to Pgr-AB was increased, indicating a shift from Pgr-A to Pgr-B expression. Basic transcription element-binding protein-1 (Bteb1), official symbol and name Klf9, Kruppel-like factor 9, which functionally interacts with Pgr in endometrium, was also decreased in the endometriosis group. In addition, hypermethylation of Hoxa10 in the endometriosis group was shown by methylation-specific PCR and confirmed by bisulfite sequencing. These findings demonstrate that normal endometrium, when placed in an ectopic location to create experimental endometriosis, led to characteristic changes in gene expression in eutopic endometrium. These data suggest the existence of a signal conduction pathway from endometriosis that alters endometrial gene expression through altered Pgr signaling and epigenetic programming.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1095/biolreprod.108.070391

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • HOXA10 expression is lower in the endometrium of women with endometriosis and is abnormally methylated.

    “We have previously shown that HOXA10 expression is lower in the endometrium of women with endometriosis and is abnormally methylated.44,53,54”

    From Altered genome-wide methylation in endometriosis (2014) · cites this paper as [44]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 65 · Cited by 204

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Lessey BA, Castelbaum AJ, Sawin SW, Buck CA, Schinnar R, Bilker W, Strom BL.Aberrant integrin expression in the endometrium of women with endometriosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1994; 79: 643–649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Authors
Lee, B., Du, H., & Taylor, H. S.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Taylor, Hugh S.
Venue
Biology of Reproduction
Published
2009-01-01
Volume
80
Issue
1
Pages
79-85
ISSN
  • 0006-3363 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-7268
OpenAlex
W2108508288
Cited by
204
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 19
FWCI
15.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biology of Reproduction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (ES010610, R01ES010610)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD-036887, HD-052668, U54HD052668)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Reproductive System and Pregnancy
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
Keywords
endometriosis, eutopic endometrium, endometrial receptivity, DNA methylation, HOXA10, HOXA11, progesterone receptor, KLF9, IGFBP-1, CD61, epigenetic programming, gene expression, mouse model
MeSH terms
Homeobox A10 Proteins, Animals, Endometriosis, Endometrium, Female, Gene Expression Regulation, Immunohistochemistry, Receptors, Progesterone, RNA, Messenger, Homeodomain Proteins, Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein 1, DNA Methylation, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, Integrin beta Chains, Mice, Kruppel-Like Transcription Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review