Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 403

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The denatured state (the other half of the folding equation) and its role in protein stability

Shortle, David·1996·The FASEB Journal

Abstract

Experimental studies of the physical interactions that stabilize protein structure are complicated by the fact that proteins do not unfold to a simple reference state. When their folded structure breaks down, protein chains do not become random coils. Instead, they enter a poorly understood ensemble of partially folded states known collectively as the denatured state. Although it has long been held that agents that promote protein unfolding act specifically oh the denatured state, the idea that mutations can exert their destabilizing (or in some cases, stabilizing) effects directly on this state is not widely accepted. A large body of thermodynamic data on mutant proteins plus a limited amount of structural information describing mutational effects on denatured states indicate that 1) the denatured state plays a central role in all aspects of protein stability, including mutant effects, and 2) a quantitative understanding of how amino acid sequence encodes protein structure will probably depend on a more complete picture of this complex, difficult‐to‐study state.—Shortle, D. The denatured state (the other half of the folding equation) and its role in protein stability. FASEB J. 10, 27‐34 (1996)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1096/fasebj.10.1.8566543

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Shortle, D.
Venue
The FASEB Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1996-01
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
27-34
ISSN
  • 0892-6638 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-6860
OpenAlex
W1517145530
Cited by
403
References
0
FWCI
9.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.