Regulation of gene expression by alternative promoters
Abstract
Promoters have been defined as modulatory DNA structures containing a complex array of CiS ‐acting regulatory elements required for accurate and efficient initiation of transcription and for controlling expression of a gene. It is becoming increasingly evident that they also constitute prime target elements through which diversity and flexibility in the complex patterns of gene expression in multicellular organisms are created. The use of multiple promoters and transcription start sites is apparently a frequently used mechanism, whereas at the same time there is considerable variation and complexity in the patterns of alternative promoter usage. This review discusses the use of alternative promoters as a versatile mechanism to create diversity and flexibility in the regulation of gene expression. Alternative promoter usage can influence gene expression in very diverse ways. The level of transcription initiation can vary between alternative promoters, the turnover or translation efficiency of mRNA isoforms with different leader exons can differ, alternative promoters can have different tissue specificity and react differently to some signals, and finally, alternative promoter usage can lead to the generation of protein isoforms differing at the amino terminus.—Ayoubi, T. A. Y., Van de Ven, W. J. M. Regulation of gene expression by alternative promoters. FASEBJ. 10, 453‐460 (1996)
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The general view on why some genes have multiple promoters is that a cell needs more expression of specific genes, and transcription from multiple promoters may add flexibility manifested through different molecular mechanisms in regulating gene expression.
“The general view on why some genes have multiple promoters is that a cell needs more expression of specific genes, and transcription from multiple promoters may add flexibility manifested through different molecular mechanisms in regulating gene expression65”
From Alternative promoters in CpG depleted regions are prevalently associated with epigenetic misregulation of liver cancer transcriptomes (2023) · cites this paper as [65]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Nepal, C., & Andersen, J. B. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-38272-4 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ayoubi, T. A. Y., & Van De Yen, W. J. M.
- Affiliations
- Vlaams Instituut voor Biotechnologie (BE)
- Laboratory for Molecular Oncology Center for Human Genetics University of Leuven, and Flanders Interuniversity Institute for Biotechnology 3000 Leuven Belgium
- Venue
- The FASEB Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1996-03
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 453-460
- ISSN
- 0892-6638 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-6860
- OpenAlex
- W1814420991
- Cited by
- 387
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 7.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The FASEB Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research
- Keywords
- alternative promoters, gene expression regulation, transcription start sites, alternative splicing, mRNA isoforms, tissue specificity, alternative translation initiation, cis-regulatory elements
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Gene Expression Regulation, Homeostasis, Humans, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Transcription, Genetic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review