The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neural mechanisms generating locomotion studied in mammalian brain stem‐spinal cord in vitro
Abstract
The neural control system for generation of locomotion is an important system for analysis of neural mechanisms underlying complex motor acts. In these studies, a novel experimental model using neonatal rat brain stem and spinal cord in vitro was developed for investigation of the locomotor system in mammals. The in vitro brain stem and spinal cord system was shown to retain functional circuitry for locomotor command generation, motor pattern generation, and sensorimotor integration. This system was exploited to investigate neurochemical mechanisms involved in neurogenesis of locomotion. Evidence was obtained for peptidergic and γ‐aminobutyric acid‐mediated mechanisms in brain‐stem circuits generating locomotor commands. Cholinergic, dopaminergic, and excitatory amino acid‐mediated mechanisms were shown to activate spinal cord circuits for locomotor pattern generation. Endogenous N‐ methyl‐ d ‐aspartic acid receptors in spinal networks were found to play a central role in the generation of locomotion. The chemically induced patterns of motor activity and rhythmic membrane potential oscillations of spinal motoneurons were characteristic of those during locomotion in other mammals in vivo. The in vitro brain stem and spinal cord model provides a versatile and powerful experimental system with potentially broad application for investigation of diverse aspects of the neurobiology of mammalian motor control systems.— S mith , J. C.; F eldman , J. L.; S chmidt , B.J. Neural mechanisms generating locomotion studied in mammalian brain stem‐spinal cord in vitro. FASEB J. 2: 2283‐2288; 1988.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Chemical activation of the mesecephalic locomotor region
Garcia-Rill, E., Skinner, R. D., & Fitzgerald, J. A. (1985) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0006-8993(85)90006-x · Cited by 163
Cited by
Circuits controlling vertebrate locomotion: moving in a new direction
Goulding, M. (2009) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2608 · Cited by 777
“More recent efforts to dissect the walking CPG have relied heavily on the isolated neonatal rat and mouse spinal cord preparatio”
BackgroundCazalets, Jr., Borde, M., & Clarac, F. (1995) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.15-07-04943.1995 · Cited by 388
Does the nervous system depend on kinesthetic information to control natural limb movements?
Gandevia, S. C., & Burke, D. (1992) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x0007254x · Cited by 359
The representation of egocentric space in the posterior parietal cortex
Stein, J. F. (1992) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00072605 · Cited by 339
The role of NMDA receptors in information processing
Daw, N. W., Stein, P. S. G., & Fox, K. (1993) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.16.030193.001231 · Cited by 311
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, J. C., Feldman, J. L., & Schmidt, B. J.
- Venue
- The FASEB Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1988-04
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2283-2288
- ISSN
- 0892-6638 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-6860
- OpenAlex
- W1937089820
- Cited by
- 223
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neural mechanisms generating locomotion studied in mammalian brain stem‐spinal cord in vitro. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1096/fasebj.2.7.2450802
- The paper
- Smith, J. C., Feldman, J. L., & Schmidt, B. J. (1988). Neural mechanisms generating locomotion studied in mammalian brain stem‐spinal cord in vitro. The FASEB Journal. https://doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.2.7.2450802
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.