The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Exploring the use of text messages for increasing nutrition knowledge and improving dietary practices in teen athletes (379.6)
Abstract
The nutrition knowledge and dietary practices of teen athletes is important for both their sports performance and overall health. Our approach to improving health communication with teen athletes takes advantage of the increasing prevalence of mobile phone and SMS messaging. This study consists of two parts: 1) conducting knowledge questions regarding nutrition and 2) developing text messages to support teen athletes. For the first part, 129 male high‐school elite wrestlers with a mean age of 16 (15‐17) years old and mean body weight of 66.6kg±15.9 (SD) were asked about their dietary practices along with general nutrition and sports nutrition knowledge. Athletes answered 59.7% of the general nutrition and 63.9% of the sports nutrition questions correctly. 58 % of the athletes believed that vitamins and minerals maintain their energy. 33.4% of the athletes answered incorrectly to the question asking which mineral promotes healthy bones and teeth. 31.8% of the athletes were skipping meals (36.6%, skipping breakfast; 46.3%, skipping lunch). 24.8% of the athletes were using ergogenic aids, and 35.0% and 15.0% were using vitamin mineral mixtures and protein powders respectively. For the second part of the study, over 100 messages were created by college students by obtaining information from popular consumer magazines or websites, health organization websites, and literature review. These messages were refined by researchers for delivery through SMS. Through a participatory process, educational text messages will be tested based on how teen athletes respond to these text messages, and their suggestions for developing additional topics of interest will be considered.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A total of 107 articles were considered eligible for full-text screening, with three articles unable to be retrieved in full text through the university document delivery portal or via contact with the study authors(48,53,54).”
From Adolescent athletes have better general than sports nutrition knowledge and lack awareness of supplement recommendations: a systematic literature review (2024) · cites this paper as [53]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hulland, S. C., Trakman, G. L., & Alcock, R. D. (2024) · British Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s0007114523002799 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Bilgiç, P., Tamer, F., Yabanci, N., Hamamcilar, O., Bilgiç, S. C., & Hongu, N.
- Affiliations
- Nutrition and Dietetics Hacettepe University Ankara Turkey
- Nutrition and Dietetics Ankara University Ankara Turkey
- Sports Education and Health Dentist, Ministary of Sports and Youth Ankara Turkey
- Sports Education and Health Ministary of Sports and Youth Ankara Turkey
- Nutritional Sciences University of Arizona Tucson AZ United States
- Venue
- The FASEB Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-04
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- S1
- ISSN
- 0892-6638
- 1530-6860
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.