The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Proline motifs in peptides and their biological processing
Abstract
Many biologically important peptide sequences contain proline. It confers unique conformational constraints on the peptide chain in that the side‐chain is cyclized back onto the backbone amide position. Inside an a‐helix the possibility of making hydrogen bonds to the preceding turn is lost and a kink will be introduced. The conformational restrictions imposed by proline motifs in a peptide chain appear to imply important structural or biological functions as can be deduced from their often remarkably high degree of conservation as found in many proteins and peptides, especially cytokines, growth factors, G‐protein‐coupled receptors, V3 loops of the HIV envelope glycoprotein gpl20, and neuro‐ and vasoactive peptides. Only a limited number of peptidases are known to be able to hydrolyze proline adjacent bonds. Their activity is influenced by the isomeric state (cis‐trans) as well as the position of proline in the peptide chain. The three proline specific metallo‐peptidases (aminopeptidase P. car‐boxroeptidase P and prolidase) are activated by Mn 2+ , whereas the three serine type peptidases cleaving a post proline bond (prolyl oligopeptidase, dipep‐tidyl peptidase IV, and prolylcarboxypeptidase) share the sequential order of the catalytic Ser‐Asp‐His triade, which differentiates them from the chy‐motrypsin (His‐Asp‐Ser) and subtilisin (Asp‐His‐Ser) families. An endo or C terminal Pro‐Pro bond and an endo pre‐Pro peptide bond possess a high degree of resistance to any mammalian proteolytic enzyme.—Vanhoof, G., Goossens, F., De Meester, I., Hendrike, D., Schärpé, S. Proline motifs in peptides and their biological processing. FASEB J. 9, 736‐744 (1995)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Lambeir, A.-M., Durinx, C., Scharpé, S., & De Meester, I. (2003) · Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences · doi:10.1080/713609354 · Cited by 955
Self-citationCoeliac disease: dissecting a complex inflammatory disorder
Sollid, L. M. (2002) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri885 · Cited by 964
CD26, let it cut or cut it down
De Meester, I., Korom, S., Van Damme, J., & Scharpé, S. (1999) · Immunology Today · doi:10.1016/s0167-5699(99)01486-3 · Cited by 451
Self-citationPanchaud, A., Affolter, M., & Kussmann, M. (2012) · Journal of Proteomics · doi:10.1016/j.jprot.2011.12.022 · Cited by 159
De Leo, F., Panarese, S., Gallerani, R., & Ceci, L. (2009) · Current Pharmaceutical Design · doi:10.2174/138161209789271834 · Cited by 149
Metadata
- Authors
- Vanhoof, G., Goossens, F., De Meester, I., Hendriks, D., & Scharpé, S.
- Venue
- The FASEB Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-06
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 736-744
- ISSN
- 0892-6638 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-6860
- OpenAlex
- W1583655086
- Cited by
- 451
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Proline motifs in peptides and their biological processing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1096/fasebj.9.9.7601338
- The paper
- Vanhoof, G., Goossens, F., De Meester, I., Hendriks, D., & Scharpé, S. (1995). Proline motifs in peptides and their biological processing. The FASEB Journal. https://doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.9.9.7601338
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.