The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Establishing the background level of base oxidation in human lymphocyte DNA: results of an interlaboratory validation study
Open accessAbstract
Accurate measurement of low levels of 8‐oxo‐7,8‐dihydro‐2'‐deoxyguanosine (8‐oxodGuo) in DNA is hampered by the ease with which guanine is oxidized during preparation of DNA for analysis. ESCODD, a consortium of mainly European laboratories, has attempted to minimize this artifact and to provide standard, reliable protocols for sample preparation and analysis. ESCODD has now analyzed 8‐oxodGuo in the DNA of lymphocytes isolated from venous blood from healthy young male volunteers in several European countries. Two approaches were used. Analysis of 8‐oxodGuo by HPLC with electrochemical detection was performed on lymphocytes from 10 groups of volunteers, in eight countries. The alternative enzymic approach was based on digestion of DNA with formamidopyrimidine DNA glycosylase (FPG) to convert 8‐oxo‐7,8‐dihydroguanine (8‐ oxoGua) to apurinic sites, subsequently measured as DNA breaks using the comet assay (7 groups of volunteers, in six countries). The median concentration of 8‐oxodGuo in lymphocyte DNA, calculated from the mean values of each group of subjects as determined by HPLC, was 4.24 per 10 6 guanines. The median concentration of FPG‐sensitive sites, measured with the comet assay, was 0.34 per 10 6 guanines. Identical samples of HeLa cells were supplied to all participants as a reference standard. The median values for 8‐oxodGuo in HeLa cells were 2.78 per 10 6 guanines (by HPLC) and 0.50 per 10 6 guanines (by enzymic methods). The discrepancy between chromatographic and FPG‐based approaches may reflect overestimation by HPLC (if spurious oxidation is still not completely controlled) or underestimation by the enzymic method. Meanwhile, it is clear that the true background level of base oxidation in DNA is orders of magnitude lower than has often been claimed in the past.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
Martin Bland, J., & Altman, D. (1986) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90837-8 · Cited by 47,965
Cited by
The Comet Assay for DNA Damage and Repair: Principles, Applications, and Limitations
Collins, A. R. (2004) · Molecular Biotechnology · doi:10.1385/mb:26:3:249 · Cited by 2,892
Self-citationGuidelines for measuring reactive oxygen species and oxidative damage in cells and in vivo
Murphy, M. P., Bayir, H., Belousov, V., Chang, C. J., Davies, K. J. A., Davies, M. J., Dick, T. P., Finkel, T., Forman, H. J., Janssen-Heininger, Y., et al. (2022) · Nature Metabolism · doi:10.1038/s42255-022-00591-z · Cited by 1,514
Base-excision repair of oxidative DNA damage
David, S. S., O'Shea, V. L., & Kundu, S. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05978 · Cited by 1,238
The comet assay: topical issues
Collins, A. R., Oscoz, A. A., Brunborg, G., Gaivao, I., Giovannelli, L., Kruszewski, M., Smith, C. C., & Stetina, R. (2008) · Mutagenesis · doi:10.1093/mutage/gem051 · Cited by 991
Self-citationMeasurement and Clinical Significance of Biomarkers of Oxidative Stress in Humans
Marrocco, I., Altieri, F., & Peluso, I. (2017) · Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity · doi:10.1155/2017/6501046 · Cited by 855
Metadata
- Authors
- ESCODD (European Standards Committee on Oxidative DNA Damage), Gedik, C. M., & Collins, A.
- Venue
- The FASEB Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-11-08
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 82-84
- ISSN
- 0892-6638 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-6860
- OpenAlex
- W1487243507
- Cited by
- 449
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Establishing the background level of base oxidation in human lymphocyte DNA: results of an interlaboratory validation study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1096/fj.04-1767fje
- The paper
- ESCODD (European Standards Committee on Oxidative DNA Damage), Gedik, C. M., & Collins, A. (2005). Establishing the background level of base oxidation in human lymphocyte DNA: results of an interlaboratory validation study. The FASEB Journal. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.04-1767fje
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.