Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 449

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Establishing the background level of base oxidation in human lymphocyte DNA: results of an interlaboratory validation study

Open access
ESCODD (European Standards Committee on Oxidative DNA Damage), Gedik, Catherine M., Collins, Andrew·2005·The FASEB Journal

Abstract

Accurate measurement of low levels of 8‐oxo‐7,8‐dihydro‐2'‐deoxyguanosine (8‐oxodGuo) in DNA is hampered by the ease with which guanine is oxidized during preparation of DNA for analysis. ESCODD, a consortium of mainly European laboratories, has attempted to minimize this artifact and to provide standard, reliable protocols for sample preparation and analysis. ESCODD has now analyzed 8‐oxodGuo in the DNA of lymphocytes isolated from venous blood from healthy young male volunteers in several European countries. Two approaches were used. Analysis of 8‐oxodGuo by HPLC with electrochemical detection was performed on lymphocytes from 10 groups of volunteers, in eight countries. The alternative enzymic approach was based on digestion of DNA with formamidopyrimidine DNA glycosylase (FPG) to convert 8‐oxo‐7,8‐dihydroguanine (8‐ oxoGua) to apurinic sites, subsequently measured as DNA breaks using the comet assay (7 groups of volunteers, in six countries). The median concentration of 8‐oxodGuo in lymphocyte DNA, calculated from the mean values of each group of subjects as determined by HPLC, was 4.24 per 10 6 guanines. The median concentration of FPG‐sensitive sites, measured with the comet assay, was 0.34 per 10 6 guanines. Identical samples of HeLa cells were supplied to all participants as a reference standard. The median values for 8‐oxodGuo in HeLa cells were 2.78 per 10 6 guanines (by HPLC) and 0.50 per 10 6 guanines (by enzymic methods). The discrepancy between chromatographic and FPG‐based approaches may reflect overestimation by HPLC (if spurious oxidation is still not completely controlled) or underestimation by the enzymic method. Meanwhile, it is clear that the true background level of base oxidation in DNA is orders of magnitude lower than has often been claimed in the past.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1096/fj.04-1767fje

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 449

Metadata

Authors
ESCODD (European Standards Committee on Oxidative DNA Damage), Gedik, C. M., & Collins, A.
Venue
The FASEB Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-11-08
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
82-84
ISSN
  • 0892-6638 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-6860
OpenAlex
W1487243507
Cited by
449
References
1
FWCI
7.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Establishing the background level of base oxidation in human lymphocyte DNA: results of an interlaboratory validation study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1096/fj.04-1767fje
The paper
ESCODD (European Standards Committee on Oxidative DNA Damage), Gedik, C. M., & Collins, A. (2005). Establishing the background level of base oxidation in human lymphocyte DNA: results of an interlaboratory validation study. The FASEB Journal. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.04-1767fje

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.