Cited by 80Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model OrganismsCardiovascular and exercise physiologyMuscle Physiology and Disorders

Long-term caloric restriction abrogates the age-related decline in skeletal muscle aerobic function

Hepple, Russell T., Baker, David J., Kaczor, Jan J., Krause, Daniel J.·2005·The FASEB Journal

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of long-term caloric restriction (CR) on the age-associated decline of skeletal muscle aerobic function. Skeletal muscle maximal aerobic performance (VO2max) was assessed in ad libitum (AL) and CR rats aged 8-10 months and 35 months using a pump-perfused hindlimb model to match oxygen delivery to muscle mass between groups. Whereas there was a 46% decline in muscle mass-specific VO2max between 8-10 mo (524+/-13 micromol x min(-1) x 100 g(-1); mean+/- SE) and 35 mo (281+/-54 micromol x min(-1) x 100 g(-1)) in AL rats, not only did CR rats begin at the same point in 8-10 mo old rats (490+/-42 micromol x min(-1) x 100 g(-1)), we found no decline in 35 mo old CR animals (484+/-49 micromol x min(-1) x 100 g(-1)). Interestingly, although most markers of oxidative capacity began at a lower point in young adult CR animals, CR rats exhibited a higher in situ activity of complex IV at VO2max. This activity allows the young adult CR animals to exhibit normal aerobic capacity despite the lower oxidative enzyme activities. In stark contrast to the 19-41% decline in activities of citrate synthase, complexes I-III, and complex IV in homogenates prepared from the plantaris muscle and mixed region of gastrocnemius muscle with aging in AL rats, no age-related decline was found in CR animals. Thus, our results showed that CR preserves aerobic function in aged skeletal muscles by facilitating a higher in situ function of complex IV and by preventing the age-related decline in mitochondrial oxidative capacity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1096/fj.04-3535fje

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 53 · Cited by 80

Authors
Hepple, R. T., Baker, D. J., Kaczor, J. J., & Krause, D. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Calgary (CA)
  • McMaster University (CA)
Venue
The FASEB Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-06-14
Volume
19
Issue
10
Pages
1320-1322
ISSN
  • 0892-6638 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-6860
OpenAlex
W2055729903
Cited by
80
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The FASEB Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MOP 57808)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
Keywords
caloric restriction, skeletal muscle aging, cardiorespiratory fitness, VO2max, mitochondrial complex IV, oxidative capacity, citrate synthase, mitochondrial respiration, age-related decline, hindlimb perfusion, plantaris muscle, gastrocnemius
MeSH terms
Aerobiosis, Aging, Animals, Electron Transport Complex IV, Mitochondria, Motor Activity, Muscle Contraction, Oxidation-Reduction, Oxygen Consumption, Rats, Inbred F344, Muscle, Skeletal, Caloric Restriction, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review