Defining a binding pocket for sulfonylureas in ATP‐sensitive potassium channels
Abstract
Sulfonylurea receptors SUR1 and SUR2 are the regulatory subunits of K(ATP) channels. Their differential affinity for hypoglycemic sulfonylureas provides a basis for the selectivity of these compounds for different K(ATP) channel isoforms. Sulfonylureas have a 100- to 1000-fold greater affinity for SUR1 vs. SUR2. Structure-activity studies suggested a bipartite binding pocket. Chimeric SUR1 approximately SUR2 receptors have shown TMD2, the third bundle of transmembrane helices, to be part of an "A" site that confers SUR1 selectivity for sulfonylureas. The purpose of this study is to determine the position of the "B" site. Previous photoaffinity labeling studies have placed the B site on the amino-terminal third of SUR and colabeled the associated K(IR). In our study, deletion of TMD0, the first bundle of transmembrane helices, did not compromise labeling. Further deletions into the cytoplasmic linker, L0, eliminated binding and labeling. Alanine substitutions in L0 identified a limited number of conserved residues, Y230 and W232, important for affinity labeling. A fragment of K(IR)6.2, missing M2 and the entire carboxyl terminal, assembles with SUR1 and is affinity labeled, while deletion of 10 or more amino-terminal residues compromises labeling. These studies indicate that the B site involves L0 and the K(IR) amino terminus, elements that are critical for control of channel gating.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A high-affinity binding site on SUR1 mediates the therapeutic effects of sulfonylureas, whereas the low-affinity sulfonylurea site on Kir6.2 is of little therapeutic relevance.
“A high-affinity binding site on SUR1 mediates the therapeutic effects of the sulfonylureas (233). The binding site has not been fully identified, and it was not resolved in the cryo-EM structure. Nevertheless, it can be guessed at. Mutagenesis studies have shown that residues in the third and eighth cytosolic loops of SUR1 contribute to SU binding (711). In the cryo-EM structure these residues lie”
From Pancreatic β-Cell Electrical Activity and Insulin Secretion: Of Mice and Men (2018) · cites this paper as [711]
Cites
Ellis, L., Clauser, E., Morgan, D. O., Edery, M., Roth, R. A., & Rutter, W. J. (1986) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(86)90786-5 · Cited by 1,070 · see citing works
Association and Stoichiometry of KATP Channel Subunits
Clement, J. P., Kunjilwar, K., Gonzalez, G., Schwanstecher, M., Panten, U., Aguilar-Bryan, L., & Bryan, J. (1997) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80321-9 · Cited by 692 · see citing works
Self-citationBabenko, A. P., Gonzalez, G., & Bryan, J. (1999) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1016/s0014-5793(99)01215-6 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pancreatic β-Cell Electrical Activity and Insulin Secretion: Of Mice and Men
Rorsman, P., & Ashcroft, F. M. (2018) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00008.2017 · Cited by 793 · see citing works
Structure of a Pancreatic ATP-Sensitive Potassium Channel
Li, N., Wu, J.-X., Ding, D., Cheng, J., Gao, N., & Chen, L. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.12.028 · Cited by 252 · see citing works
Multitarget PPARγ Agonists as Innovative Modulators of the Metabolic Syndrome
Ammazzalorso, A., Maccallini, C., Amoia, P., & Amoroso, R. (2019) · European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2019.04.030 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
- Authors
- Vila‐Carriles, W. H., Zhao, G., & Bryan, J.
- Affiliations
- Departments of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics Houston Texas USA
- Baylor College of Medicine (US)
- Venue
- The FASEB Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-11-16
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 18-25
- ISSN
- 0892-6638 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-6860
- OpenAlex
- W2012735248
- Cited by
- 68
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The FASEB Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (DK44311, GM66478)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion channel regulation and function
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › ATP Synthase and ATPases Research
- Keywords
- sulfonylurea receptor, SUR1, SUR2, ATP-sensitive potassium channels, B-site, Kir6.2, photoaffinity labeling, channel gating, transmembrane domain deletion
- MeSH terms
- Adenosine Triphosphate, Affinity Labels, Alanine, Animals, Binding Sites, Chlorocebus aethiops, Glyburide, Cricetinae, Structure-Activity Relationship, Sulfonylurea Compounds, Blotting, Western, Potassium Channels, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Mutagenesis, Site-Directed, COS Cells, Amino Acid Substitution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review