Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 257

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Neuronal viability is controlled by a functional relation between synaptic and extrasynaptic NMDA receptors

Léveillé, F., gaamouch, F. El, Gouix, E., Lecocq, M., Lobner, D., Nicole, O., Buisson, A.·2008·The FASEB Journal

Abstract

N‐ methyl‐D‐aspartate receptors (NMDARs) are critical for synaptic plasticity that underlies learning and memory. But, they have also been described as a common source of neuronal damage during stroke and neurodegenerative diseases. Several studies have sug gested that cellular location of NMDARs (synaptic or extrasynaptic) is a key parameter controlling their effect on neuronal viability. The aim of the study was to understand the relation between these two pools of receptors and to determine their implication in both beneficial and/or deleterious events related to NMDAR activation. We demonstrated that selective extrasynap tic NMDAR activation, as well as NMDA bath applica tion, does not activate extracellular signal‐regulated kinase (ERK) pathways, but induces mitochondrial membrane potential breakdown and triggers cell body and dendrite damages, whereas synaptic NMDAR acti vation is innocuous and induces a sustained ERK acti vation. The functional dichotomy between these two NMDAR pools is tightly controlled by glutamate uptake systems. Finally, we demonstrated that the only clini cally approved NMDAR antagonist, memantine, prefer entially antagonizes extrasynaptic NMDARs. Together, these results suggest that extrasynaptic NMDAR activa tion contributes to excitotoxicity and that a selective targeting of the extrasynaptic NMDARs represents a promising therapeutic strategy for brain injuries.— Léveillé, F., El gaamouch, F., Gouix, E., Lecocq, M., Lobner, D., Nicole, O., Buisson, A. Neuronal viability is controlled by a functional relation between synaptic and extrasynaptic NMDA receptors. FASEB J. 22, 4258–4271 (2008)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1096/fj.08-107268

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Cited by

See all 257

Metadata

Authors
Léveillé, F., gaamouch, F. E., Gouix, E., Lecocq, M., Lobner, D., Nicole, O., & Buisson, A.
Venue
The FASEB Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-08-18
Volume
22
Issue
12
Pages
4258-4271
ISSN
  • 0892-6638 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-6860
OpenAlex
W2006815009
Cited by
257
References
13
FWCI
6.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neuronal viability is controlled by a functional relation between synaptic and extrasynaptic NMDA receptors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1096/fj.08-107268
The paper
Léveillé, F., gaamouch, F. E., Gouix, E., Lecocq, M., Lobner, D., Nicole, O., & Buisson, A. (2008). Neuronal viability is controlled by a functional relation between synaptic and extrasynaptic NMDA receptors. The FASEB Journal. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.08-107268

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.