The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neuronal viability is controlled by a functional relation between synaptic and extrasynaptic NMDA receptors
Abstract
N‐ methyl‐D‐aspartate receptors (NMDARs) are critical for synaptic plasticity that underlies learning and memory. But, they have also been described as a common source of neuronal damage during stroke and neurodegenerative diseases. Several studies have sug gested that cellular location of NMDARs (synaptic or extrasynaptic) is a key parameter controlling their effect on neuronal viability. The aim of the study was to understand the relation between these two pools of receptors and to determine their implication in both beneficial and/or deleterious events related to NMDAR activation. We demonstrated that selective extrasynap tic NMDAR activation, as well as NMDA bath applica tion, does not activate extracellular signal‐regulated kinase (ERK) pathways, but induces mitochondrial membrane potential breakdown and triggers cell body and dendrite damages, whereas synaptic NMDAR acti vation is innocuous and induces a sustained ERK acti vation. The functional dichotomy between these two NMDAR pools is tightly controlled by glutamate uptake systems. Finally, we demonstrated that the only clini cally approved NMDAR antagonist, memantine, prefer entially antagonizes extrasynaptic NMDARs. Together, these results suggest that extrasynaptic NMDAR activa tion contributes to excitotoxicity and that a selective targeting of the extrasynaptic NMDARs represents a promising therapeutic strategy for brain injuries.— Léveillé, F., El gaamouch, F., Gouix, E., Lecocq, M., Lobner, D., Nicole, O., Buisson, A. Neuronal viability is controlled by a functional relation between synaptic and extrasynaptic NMDA receptors. FASEB J. 22, 4258–4271 (2008)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A synaptic model of memory: long-term potentiation in the hippocampus
Bliss, T. V. P., & Collingridge, G. L. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/361031a0 · Cited by 11,566
The Glutamate Receptor Ion Channels
Dingledine, R., Borges, K., Bowie, D., & Traynelis, S. F. (1999) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0031-6997(24)01394-2 · Cited by 3,554
Long-Term Potentiation--A Decade of Progress?
Malenka, R. C., & Nicoll, A. R. A. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.285.5435.1870 · Cited by 2,729
MacDermott, A. B., Mayer, M. L., Westbrook, G. L., Smith, S. J., & Barker, J. L. (1986) · Nature · doi:10.1038/321519a0 · Cited by 1,835
Extrasynaptic NMDARs oppose synaptic NMDARs by triggering CREB shut-off and cell death pathways
Hardingham, G. E., Fukunaga, Y., & Bading, H. (2002) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn835 · Cited by 1,686
Paradigm shift in neuroprotection by NMDA receptor blockade: memantine and beyond
Lipton, S. A. (2006) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd1958 · Cited by 909
Liu, Y., Wong, T. P., Aarts, M., Rooyakkers, A., Liu, L., Lai, T. W., Wu, D. C., Lu, J., Tymianski, M., Craig, A. M., et al. (2007) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0116-07.2007 · Cited by 773
Molecular Mechanisms of Glutamate Receptor-Mediated Excitotoxic Neuronal Cell Death
Sattler, R., & Tymianski, M. (2001) · Molecular Neurobiology · doi:10.1385/mn:24:1-3:107 · Cited by 537
Synaptic NMDA receptor activity boosts intrinsic antioxidant defenses
Papadia, S., Soriano, F. X., Léveillé, F., Martel, M.-A., Dakin, K. A., Hansen, H. H., Kaindl, A., Sifringer, M., Fowler, J., Stefovska, V., et al. (2008) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn2071 · Cited by 498
Self-citationN-Methyl-d-aspartate receptor subtypes: multiple roles in excitotoxicity and neurological disease
Waxman, E. A., & Lynch, D. R. (2005) · The Neuroscientist · doi:10.1177/1073858404269012 · Cited by 372
Cited by
Glutamate Receptor Ion Channels: Structure, Regulation, and Function
Traynelis, S. F., Wollmuth, L. P., McBain, C. J., Menniti, F. S., Vance, K. M., Ogden, K. K., Hansen, K. B., Yuan, H., Myers, S. J., & Dingledine, R. (2010) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.109.002451 · Cited by 3,568
Synaptic versus extrasynaptic NMDA receptor signalling: implications for neurodegenerative disorders
Hardingham, G. E., & Bading, H. (2010) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2911 · Cited by 1,644
The stressed synapse: the impact of stress and glucocorticoids on glutamate transmission
Popoli, M., Yan, Z., McEwen, B. S., & Sanacora, G. (2012) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3138 · Cited by 1,393
Excitotoxicity and stroke: Identifying novel targets for neuroprotection
Lai, T. W., Zhang, S., & Wang, Y. T. (2014) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2013.11.006 · Cited by 1,106
Role of Glutamate and NMDA Receptors in Alzheimer’s Disease
Wang, R., & Reddy, P. H. (2017) · Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-160763 · Cited by 1,009
Metadata
- Authors
- Léveillé, F., gaamouch, F. E., Gouix, E., Lecocq, M., Lobner, D., Nicole, O., & Buisson, A.
- Venue
- The FASEB Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-08-18
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 4258-4271
- ISSN
- 0892-6638 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-6860
- OpenAlex
- W2006815009
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 6.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neuronal viability is controlled by a functional relation between synaptic and extrasynaptic NMDA receptors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1096/fj.08-107268
- The paper
- Léveillé, F., gaamouch, F. E., Gouix, E., Lecocq, M., Lobner, D., Nicole, O., & Buisson, A. (2008). Neuronal viability is controlled by a functional relation between synaptic and extrasynaptic NMDA receptors. The FASEB Journal. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.08-107268
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.