Cited by 383Gut microbiota and healthOral microbiology and periodontitis researchMicrobial Community Ecology and Physiology

The Human Microbiome Project strategy for comprehensive sampling of the human microbiome and why it matters

Open access
Aagaard, Kjersti, Petrosino, Joseph, Keitel, Wendy, Watson, Mark, Katancik, James, Garcia, Nathalia, Patel, Shital, Cutting, Mary +7 more·2013·The FASEB Journal

Abstract

The Human Microbiome Project used rigorous good clinical practice standards to complete comprehensive body site sampling in healthy 18‐ to 40‐yr‐old adults, creating an unparalleled reference set of microbiome specimens. To ensure that specimens represented minimally perturbed microbiomes, we first screened potential participants using exclusion criteria based on health history, including the presence of systemic diseases ( e.g. , hypertension, cancer, or immunodeficiency or autoimmune disorders), use of potential immunomodulators, and recent use of antibiotics or probiotics. Subsequent physical examinations excluded individuals based on body mass index (BMI), cutaneous lesions, and oral health. We screened 554 individuals to enroll 300 (149 men and 151 women, mean age 26 yr, mean BMI 24 kg/m 2 , 20.0% racial minority, and 10.7% Hispanic). We obtained specimens from the oral cavity, nares, skin, gastrointestinal tract, and vagina (15 specimens from men and 18 from women). The study evaluated longitudinal changes in an individual's microbiome by sampling 279 participants twice (mean 212 d after the first sampling; range 30‐359 d) and 100 individuals 3 times (mean 72 d after the second sampling; range 30‐224 d). This sampling strategy yielded 11,174 primary specimens, from which 12,479 DNA samples were submitted to 4 centers for metagenomic sequencing. Our clinical design and well‐defined reference cohort has laid a foundation for microbiome research.—Aagaard, K., Petrosino, J., Keitel, W., Watson, M., Katancik, J., Garcia, N., Patel, S., Cutting, M., Madden, T., Hamilton, H., Harris, E., Gevers, D., Simone, G., McInnes, P., Versalovic, J. The Human Microbiome Project strategy for comprehensive sampling of the human microbiome and why it matters. FASEB J. 27, 1012–1022 (2013). www.fasebj.org

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1096/fj.12-220806

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • HMP1 yielded community resources including nucleotide sequences of microorganisms and communities, protocols for reproducible body-wide microbiome sampling and data generation, and computational methods for microbiome analysis and epidemiology.

    “This first phase of the HMP (HMP1) thus yielded a wealth of community resources: nucleotide sequences of microorganisms and communities from a large number of isolates, individuals, and populations (http://hmpdacc.org)34–37; protocols to support reproducible body-wide microbiome sampling and data generation38–40; and computational methods for microbiome analysis and epidemiology41–47.”

    From The Integrative Human Microbiome Project (2019) · cites this paper as [38]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 44 · Cited by 383

Authors
Aagaard, K., Petrosino, J., Keitel, W., Watson, M., Katancik, J., Garcia, N., Patel, S., Cutting, M., Madden, T., Hamilton, H., Harris, E., Gevers, D., Simone, G., McInnes, P., & Versalovic, J.
Affiliations
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
  • St. Louis University St. Louis Missouri USA
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Broad Institute (US)
  • Emmes (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Aagaard, Kjersti
Venue
The FASEB Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-11-19
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
1012-1022
ISSN
  • 0892-6638 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-6860
OpenAlex
W2167415413
Cited by
383
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 3
FWCI
8.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The FASEB Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (U54HG004973, U54HG004968)
  • National Human Genome Research Institute
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
Keywords
Human Microbiome Project, human microbiome, healthy adults, longitudinal microbiome changes, metagenomic sequencing, oral microbiota, vaginal microbiota, skin microbiome, gastrointestinal microbiome, nasopharyngeal microbiota
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Mouth, Skin, Specimen Handling, Vagina, Body Mass Index, Gastrointestinal Tract, Metagenome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review