Transgenerational epigenetic inheritance in mammals: How good is the evidence?
Abstract
Epigenetics plays an important role in orchestrating key biologic processes. Epigenetic marks, including DNA methylation, histones, chromatin structure, and noncoding RNAs, are modified throughout life in response to environmental and behavioral influences. With each new generation, DNA methylation patterns are erased in gametes and reset after fertilization, probably to prevent these epigenetic marks from being transferred from parents to their offspring. However, some recent animal studies suggest an apparent resistance to complete erasure of epigenetic marks during early development, enabling transgenerational epigenetic inheritance. Whether there are similar mechanisms in humans remains unclear, with the exception of epigenetic imprinting. Nevertheless, a distinctly different mechanism—namely, intrauterine exposure to environmental stressors that may affect establishment of the newly composing epigenetic patterns after fertilization—is often confused with transgenerational epigenetic inheritance. In this review, we delineate the definition of and requirement for transgenerational epigenetic inheritance, differentiate it from the consequences of intrauterine exposure, and discuss the available evidence in both animal models and humans.—Van Otterdijk, S. D., Michels, K. B. Transgenerational epigenetic inheritance in mammals: how good is the evidence? FASEB J. 30, 2457‐2465 (2016). www.fasebj.org
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Transgenerational epigenetic stability has been defined differently, from intergenerational epigenetic inheritance (direct heritage from parents to children) to transgenerational inheritance (descending from F0 to F2, grandparents to grandchildren).
“Additionally, transgenerational epigenetic stability [44,49,50] has been defined differently, from intergenerational epigenetic inheritance, which represents the direct heritage of epigenetic marks from one generation to the next, which means directly from parents to children, to transgenerational inheritance, which has been defined as descending from F0 to F2, in other words, from grandparents to”
From Revisiting Epigenetics Fundamentals and Its Biomedical Implications (2024) · cites this paper as [43]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 97 · Cited by 191
- Authors
- van Otterdijk, S. D., & Michels, K. B.
- Affiliations
- Institute for Prevention and Cancer Epidemiology, University Medical Center Freiburg Freiburg Germany
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Corresponding author
- Michels, Karin B.
- ORCID
- Michels, Karin B.
- Venue
- The FASEB Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-04
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2457-2465
- ISSN
- 0892-6638 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-6860
- OpenAlex
- W2321727026
- Cited by
- 191
- References
- 97
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 14
- FWCI
- 2.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The FASEB Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting
- Keywords
- transgenerational epigenetic inheritance, DNA methylation, epigenetic reprogramming, gamete formation, epigenetic imprinting, developmental programming, histone modifications, non-coding RNA, chromatin structure
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Mammals, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, DNA Methylation, Inheritance Patterns, Epigenesis, Genetic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review