Cited by 124Liver physiology and pathologyDrug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and ProtectionCytokine Signaling Pathways and Interactions

Liver regeneration induced by a designer human IL‐6/ sIL‐6R fusion protein reverses severe hepatocellular injury

Galun, Eithan, Zeira, Evelyn, Pappo, Orit, Peters, Malte, Rose-John, Stefan·2000·The FASEB Journal

Abstract

The cytokine IL‐6 plays a significant role in liver regeneration in conjunction with additional growth factors (HGF, TNF‐a, and TGF‐a). Many IL‐6 effects depend on a naturally occurring soluble IL‐6 receptor (sIL‐6R). Here, the chimeric protein hyper‐IL‐6, constructed from the human IL‐6 protein fused to a truncated form of its receptor, was found to have superagonistic IL‐6 properties, and as such, enhanced liver cell regeneration. Hyper‐IL‐6 reversed the state of hepatotoxicity and enhanced the survival rates of rats suffering from fulminant hepatic failure after D‐galac‐tosamine administration. The hyper‐IL‐6 protein has a significant potential for use in the treatment of severe human liver diseases.—Galun, E., Zeira, E., Pappo, O., Peters, M., Rose‐John, S. Liver regeneration induced by a designer human IL‐6/sIL‐6R fusion protein reverses severe hepatocellular injury. FASEB J. 14, 1979–1987 (2000)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1096/fj.99-0913com

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Although IL-6 classic signaling promotes compensatory hepatocyte proliferation, IL-6 trans-signaling is more important in liver regeneration.

    “Although the classic or cis-signaling of IL-6 is determined to promote the compensatory proliferation of hepatocytes, its trans-signaling in liver regeneration is more important [19, 25–27].”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 37 · Cited by 124

Authors
Galun, E., Zeira, E., Pappo, O., Peters, M., & Rose-John, S.
Affiliations
  • Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
  • Hadassah Medical Center (IL)
  • Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
  • Department of Pathology Hadassah University Hospital Jerusalem Israel
Corresponding author
Galun, Eithan
Venue
The FASEB Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-10
Volume
14
Issue
13
Pages
1979-1987
ISSN
  • 0892-6638 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-6860
OpenAlex
W2021645238
Cited by
124
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
5.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The FASEB Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver physiology and pathology
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cytokine Signaling Pathways and Interactions
Keywords
liver regeneration, interleukin-6, soluble IL-6 receptor, hyper-IL-6, hepatocyte injury, acute liver failure, D-galactosamine hepatotoxicity
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Division, Disease Models, Animal, Galactosamine, Humans, Liver Regeneration, Male, Rats, Inbred F344, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, Thioacetamide, Interleukin-6, Liver Failure, Apoptosis, Receptors, Interleukin, Receptors, Interleukin-6, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review