Cited by 138Renal cell carcinoma treatmentCancer Diagnosis and TreatmentUrinary and Genital Oncology Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Colloidal Iron Staining in Renal Epithelial Neoplasms, Including Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma: Emphasis on Technique and Patterns of Staining

Tickoo, Satish K., Amin, Mahul B., Zarbo, Richard J.·1998·The American Journal of Surgical Pathology

Abstract

Positive staining with Hale's colloidal iron stain, or modifications thereof, is considered a diagnostic feature for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma and has been used as a discriminatory feature to differentiate it from other renal tumors. We studied colloidal iron staining in 62 cases encompassing a wide histologic spectrum of renal neoplasms (14 chromophobe renal cell carcinomas, 19 renal oncocytomas, 11 each of granular variants and conventional clear cell renal cell carcinomas, and 7 eosinophilic variants of papillary renal cell carcinoma) to investigate the specificity of the stain for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma. In cases of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, sections from two different areas were stained to ascertain whether there was any spatial variation in staining. Influence of staining techniques on the results also was investigated by staining each case of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma using two different methods: the traditional Hale's and a modified Mowry's technique, which treats sections with 3% acetic acid before adding the colloidal iron. Our results show that positive staining with colloidal iron stain is not limited to chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, however, a diffuse and strong, reticular staining pattern was observed only in cases of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (14 of 14). The staining patterns were less consistent in all other renal neoplasms and differed from the reaction observed in chromophobe renal cell carcinoma. Most renal oncocytomas (16 of 19) had focal and weak, fine dustlike positivity, and all clear cell carcinomas showed focal, coarse, dropletlike positive staining (22 of 22), in addition to a focal, coarse, bubbly pattern in 5 of 11 clear cell subtypes. Although all seven cases of the eosinophilic variant of papillary renal cell carcinoma showed strong, coarse, dropletlike staining, most of the positivity was coincident with the Perl's (prussian blue) reaction, indicating that the staining was due to hemosiderin, which is frequently present in this histologic subtype of renal cell carcinoma. Staining intensity did not vary considerably among different areas of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, but the modified Mowry's method yielded brighter and sharper reticular staining, as compared with the Hale's method. Our results show that in the appropriate morphologic context diffuse and strong reticular positivity using the modified Mowry's colloidal iron stain method is highly characteristic for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma. Treatment of sections with 3% acetic acid before adding the colloidal iron gives technically superior staining results.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00000478-199804000-00005

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 17 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Bonsib, 1996, J Urol Pathol, 4, 9
  2. Bugert, 1996, Am J Pathol, 149, 2081
  3. Davis, 1991, J Urogenital Pathol, 1, 41
  4. DeLong, 1996, J Urol Pathol, 4, 1
  5. Speicher, 1994, Am J Pathol, 145, 356
  6. Steiner, 1996, Am J Pathol, 149, 1791
  7. Tickoo, 1997, Mod Pathol, 10, 91A
  8. Weiss, 1995, Am J Pathol, 103, 624

Metadata

Authors
Tickoo, S. K., Amin, M. B., & Zarbo, R. J.
Affiliations
Henry Ford Health (US)
Corresponding author
Amin, Mahul B.
Venue
The American Journal of Surgical Pathology
Published
1998-04
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
419-424
ISSN
0147-5185 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2007654659
Cited by
138
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 2
FWCI
5.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Surgical Pathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Renal cell carcinoma treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Urinary and Genital Oncology Studies
Keywords
chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, colloidal iron staining, renal oncocytoma, clear cell renal cell carcinoma, papillary renal cell carcinoma, hemosiderin, renal neoplasms, diagnostic specificity, staining technique comparison, acetic acid pretreatment
MeSH terms
Carcinoma, Papillary, Carcinoma, Renal Cell, Colloids, Diagnosis, Differential, Histocytochemistry, Humans, Iron, Kidney Neoplasms, Staining and Labeling, Adenoma, Oxyphilic, Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review