Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 300

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Preoperative Antiplatelet Therapy Does Not Increase the Risk of Spinal Hematoma Associated with Regional Anesthesia

Horlocker, Terese T., Wedel, Denise J., Schroeder, Darrell R., Rose, Steven H., Elliott, Beth A., McGregor, Diana G., Wong, Gilbert Y.·1995·Anesthesia & Analgesia

Abstract

One thousand orthopedic procedures in 924 patients given spinal or epidural anesthesia were prospectively studied to determine the risk of hemorrhagic complications associated with regional anesthesia. A history of excessive bruising or bleeding was elicited in 115 (12%) patients. Preoperative antiplatelet medications were taken by 386 (39%) patients. Aspirin was the most frequently reported antiplatelet drug and was taken by 193 patients. Subcutaneous heparin was administered to 22 patients before surgery on the operative day. One patient of 774 tested had a preoperative platelet count less than 100,000/mm3. In addition, 26 of 171 preoperative prothrombin times and 10 of 115 preoperative activated partial thromboplastin times were longer than normal. Only 31 preoperative bleeding times were performed; five were prolonged. There were no documented spinal hematomas (major hemorrhagic complications). Blood was noted during needle or catheter placement (minor hemorrhagic complication) in 223 (22%) patients, including 73 patients with frank blood in the needle or catheter. Preoperative antiplatelet therapy did not increase the incidence of minor hemorrhagic complications. However, female gender, increased age, a history of excessive bruising/bleeding, surgery to the hip, continuous catheter anesthetic technique, large needle gauge, multiple needle passes, and moderate or difficult needle placement were all significant risk factors. The lack of correlation between antiplatelet medications and bloody needle or catheter placement (producing clinically insignificant collections of blood in the spinal canal or epidural space) is strong evidence that preoperative antiplatelet therapy is not a significant risk factor for the development of neurologic dysfunction from spinal hematoma in patients who undergo spinal or epidural anesthesia while receiving these medications.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00000539-199502000-00017

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 300

Metadata

Authors
Horlocker, T. T., Wedel, D. J., Schroeder, D. R., Rose, S. H., Elliott, B. A., McGregor, D. G., & Wong, G. Y.
Venue
Anesthesia & Analgesia
Published
1995-02
Volume
80
Issue
2
Pages
303-309
ISSN
0003-2999 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2065701988
Cited by
300
References
3
FWCI
14.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Preoperative Antiplatelet Therapy Does Not Increase the Risk of Spinal Hematoma Associated with Regional Anesthesia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00000539-199502000-00017
The paper
Horlocker, T. T., Wedel, D. J., Schroeder, D. R., Rose, S. H., Elliott, B. A., McGregor, D. G., & Wong, G. Y. (1995). Preoperative Antiplatelet Therapy Does Not Increase the Risk of Spinal Hematoma Associated with Regional Anesthesia. Anesthesia & Analgesia. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000539-199502000-00017

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.