Cited by 103Healthcare cost, quality, practicesAnesthesia and Sedative AgentsHealthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Drug Use Inefficiency: A Hidden Source of Wasted Health Care Dollars

Gillerman, Richard G., Browning, Richard A.·2000·Anesthesia & Analgesia

Abstract

UNLABELLED: A potential area for departmental savings is to minimize inefficient use of pharmaceuticals. We recorded drug waste data for multiple drugs for a fiscal year and surveyed providers' knowledge of departmental drug waste. Six large-cost or large-volume use drugs were chosen for study: thiopental, succinylcholine, rocuronium, atracurium, midazolam, and propofol. Amounts administered to patients were collected for one year by using a computerized anesthesia record keeper. Total drug distributed was the number of vials restocked by pharmacy for the year. An efficiency index, the percent administered to patients, was calculated for each drug. Drug administration to 25,481 patients was analyzed. Drug use efficiency indices were: atracurium 29%; thiopental, 31%; succinylcholine, 33%; propofol, 49%; midazolam, 53%; rocuronium, 61%. The total cost of unadministered study drugs was $165,667, 26% of the expenditure for all drugs. Most dollars wasted were for propofol, $80,863, and thiopental, $32,839. The reason most cited for drug waste was the disposal of full, or partially full, syringes. Drug wastage represents a significant portion of the entire anesthesia drug budget. Waste reduction strategies should allow a portion of the "avoidable" waste to be reduced. IMPLICATIONS: Unadministered drug amounts were measured for six study drugs over one fiscal year and found to be significant; the cost of unadministered drugs totaled $165,667. The reason most cited for waste was disposal of full, or partially full, syringes.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00000539-200010000-00028

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 103

Metadata

Authors
Gillerman, R. G., & Browning, R. A.
Affiliations
Rhode Island Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Gillerman, Richard G.
Venue
Anesthesia & Analgesia
Published
2000-10
Volume
91
Issue
4
Pages
921-924
ISSN
0003-2999 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2081055529
Cited by
103
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 5
FWCI
5.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Anesthesia & Analgesia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare cost, quality, practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
Keywords
pharmaceutical waste, anaesthetic drugs, propofol, thiopental, succinylcholine, rocuronium, atracurium, midazolam, syringe disposal, health care costs, efficiency index
MeSH terms
Rocuronium, Androstanols, Anesthesia Department, Hospital, Anesthetics, Atracurium, Budgets, Neuromuscular Nondepolarizing Agents, Drug Utilization, Efficiency, Hospital Records, Humans, Hypnotics and Sedatives, Medical Waste, Midazolam, Neuromuscular Depolarizing Agents, Pharmacy Service, Hospital, Succinylcholine, Syringes, Thiopental, Propofol, Medical Records Systems, Computerized, Drug Costs, Health Care Costs, Anesthetics, Intravenous

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review