The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Anesthesia-related Deaths during Obstetric Delivery in the United States, 1979–1990
Open accessAbstract
Background: Anesthesia-related complications are the sixth leading cause of pregnancy-related death in the United States. This study reports characteristics of anesthesia-related deaths during obstetric delivery in the United States from 1979-1990. Methods: Each state reports deaths that occur within 1 yr of delivery to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention as part of the ongoing Pregnancy Mortality Surveillance. Maternal death certificates (with identifiers removed) matched with live birth or fetal death certificates when available from 1979-1990 were reviewed to identify deaths due to anesthesia, the cause of death, the procedure for delivery, and the type of anesthesia provided. Maternal mortality rates per million live births were calculated. Case fatality rates and risk ratios were computed to compare general to regional anesthesia for cesarean section deliveries. Results: The anesthesia-related maternal mortality rate decreased from 4.3 per million live births in the first triennium (1979-1981) to 1.7 per million in the last (1988-1990). The number of deaths involving general anesthesia have remained stable, but the number of regional anesthesia-related deaths have decreased since 1984. The case-fatality risk ratio for general anesthesia was 2.3 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9-2.9) times that for regional anesthesia before 1985, increasing to 16.7 (95% CI, 12.9-21.8) times that after 1985. Conclusions: Most maternal deaths due to complications of anesthesia occurred during general anesthesia for cesarean section. Regional anesthesia is not without risk, primarily because of the toxicity of local anesthetics and excessively high regional blocks. The incidence of these deaths is decreasing, however, and deaths due to general anesthesia remain stable in number and hence account for an increased proportion of total deaths. Heightened awareness of the toxicity of local anesthetics and related improvements in technique may have contributed to a reduction in complications of regional anesthesia.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
(2000) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1067/mob.2000.107928 · Cited by 3,270
Gestational Hypertension and Preeclampsia
(2020) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000003891 · Cited by 2,949
Vanden Hoek, T. L., Morrison, L. J., Shuster, M., Donnino, M., Sinz, E., Lavonas, E. J., Jeejeebhoy, F. M., & Gabrielli, A. (2010) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.110.971069 · Cited by 720
Techniques for preventing hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section
Cyna, A. M., Andrew, M., Emmett, R. S., Middleton, P., & Simmons, S. W. (2006) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd002251.pub2 · Cited by 422
Severe maternal morbidity in Canada, 1991-2001
Wen, S. W. (2005) · Canadian Medical Association Journal · doi:10.1503/cmaj.045156 · Cited by 277
Metadata
- Authors
- Hawkins, J. L., Koonin, L. M., Palmer, S. K., & Gibbs, C. P.
- Venue
- Anesthesiology
- Published
- 1997-02-01
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 277-284
- ISSN
- 0003-3022 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2074231327
- Cited by
- 625
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 28.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anesthesia-related Deaths during Obstetric Delivery in the United States, 1979–1990. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00000542-199702000-00002
- The paper
- Hawkins, J. L., Koonin, L. M., Palmer, S. K., & Gibbs, C. P. (1997). Anesthesia-related Deaths during Obstetric Delivery in the United States, 1979–1990. Anesthesiology. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199702000-00002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.