The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Transient Neurologic Symptoms after Spinal Anesthesia: An Epidemiologic Study of 1,863 Patients
Abstract
Background: Recent evidence suggests that transient neurologic symptoms commonly follow lidocaine spinal anesthesia. However, information concerning factors that affect their occurrence is limited. Accordingly, to evaluate many potential risk factors, the authors undertook a prospective, multicenter, epidemiologic study. Methods: On a voluntary basis, anesthetists at 15 participating centers forwarded a data sheet on patients who had spinal anesthesia to a research nurse blinded to the details of anesthesia and surgery. A subset was randomly selected for follow-up. The pressure [corrected] of transient neurologic symptoms, defined as leg or buttock pain, was the principal outcome variable. Logistic regression was used to control for potential confounders, and adjusted odds ratios and confidence intervals were used to estimate relative risk. Results: During a 14-month period, 1,863 patients were studied, of whom 47% received lidocaine, 40% bupivacaine, and 13% tetracaine. Patients given lidocaine were at higher risk for symptoms compared with those receiving bupivacaine (relative risk, 5.1; 95% CI, 2.5 to 10.2) or tetracaine (relative risk, 3.2; 95% CI, 1.04 to 9.84). For patients who received lidocaine, the relative risk of transient neurologic symptoms was 2.6 (95% CI, 1.5 to 4.5) with the lithotomy position compared with other positions, 3.6 (95% CI, 1.9 to 6.8), for outpatients compared with inpatients, and 1.6 (95% CI, 1 to 2.5) for obese (body mass index >30) compared with nonobese patients. Conclusions: These results indicate that transient neurologic symptoms commonly follow lidocaine spinal anesthesia but are relatively uncommon with bupivacaine or tetracaine. The data identify lithotomy position and outpatient status as important risk factors in patients who receive lidocaine. Among other factors postulated to increase risk, obesity had an effect of borderline statistical significance, whereas age, sex, history of back pain, needle type, and lidocaine dose and concentration failed to affect risk.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Post-dural puncture headache: pathogenesis, prevention and treatment
Turnbull, D. K., & Shepherd, D. B. (2003) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1093/bja/aeg231 · Cited by 851
Jenkins, K., & Baker, A. B. (2003) · Anaesthesia · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2044.2003.03410.x · Cited by 150
Metadata
- Authors
- Freedman, J. M., Li, D.-K., Drasner, K., Jaskela, M. C., Larsen, B., & Wi, S.
- Venue
- Anesthesiology
- Published
- 1998-09-01
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 633-641.
- ISSN
- 0003-3022 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1973471270
- Cited by
- 323
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 23.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Transient Neurologic Symptoms after Spinal Anesthesia: An Epidemiologic Study of 1,863 Patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00000542-199809000-00012
- The paper
- Freedman, J. M., Li, D.-K., Drasner, K., Jaskela, M. C., Larsen, B., & Wi, S. (1998). Transient Neurologic Symptoms after Spinal Anesthesia: An Epidemiologic Study of 1,863 Patients. Anesthesiology. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199809000-00012
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.